Cited by 91Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHealth Education and ValidationCardiac Health and Mental Health

Validation of the AF-QoL, a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with atrial fibrillation

Arribas, F., Ormaetxe, J. M., Peinado, R., Perulero, N., Ramirez, P., Badia, X.·2010·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the performance of AF-QoL, a quality of life questionnaire for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Observational, prospective, multicentre study in 29 Spanish centres. Three patients' groups were identified at baseline visit: AF patients receiving a new therapeutic intervention according to physician criteria (intervention group); AF clinically stable patients according to physician evaluation (clinically stable group); and patients in a stable condition for more than 1 year after a myocardial infarction (control group). All patients were > or = 18 years. Follow-up visit was at 1 month (clinically stable group) and 3 +/- 1 months (intervention group). Sociodemographic and clinical information was gathered. AF-QoL, SF-36, and patient self-perception of general health status were administered. A total of 417 patients was included. Mean (SD) age was 61.2 (12.4), 31.4% women. AF-QoL mean overall score in AF patients (43.6) was lower (worse health-related quality of life, HRQoL) than in the control group (51.7) (P < 0.05). At baseline, patients with higher frequency of symptoms (P < 0.05) and worse NYHA functional class (P < 0.01) reported lower AF-QoL scores. AF-QoL and SF-36 correlated in all of their domains (r = 0.14-0.8, P < 0.01). AF-QoL showed good internal consistency (0.92) and test-retest reliability (0.86). CONCLUSION: AF-QoL is a valid and reliable HRQoL measure. Further investigation is recommended before using it in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eup421

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arribas, F., Ormaetxe, J. M., Peinado, R., Perulero, N., Ramirez, P., & Badia, X.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
  • Hospital de Basurto (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
Corresponding author
Badia, X.
Venue
Europace
Published
2010-01-06
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
364-370
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2164691945
Cited by
91
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, health-related quality of life, disease-specific questionnaire, questionnaire validation, SF-36, NYHA functional class, symptom frequency, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, myocardial infarction
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spain, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review