Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: The International Collaboration on Heart Failure Subtypes

Open access
Ho, Jennifer E., Enserro, Danielle, Brouwers, Frank P., Kizer, Jorge R., Shah, Sanjiv J., Psaty, Bruce M., Bartz, Traci M., Santhanakrishnan, Rajalakshmi, Lee, Douglas S., Chan, Cheeling, Liu, Kiang, Blaha, Michael J., Hillege, Hans L., van der Harst, Pim, van Gilst, Wiek H., Kop, Willem J., Gansevoort, Ron T., Vasan, Ramachandran S., Gardin, Julius M., Levy, Daniel, Gottdiener, John S., de Boer, Rudolf A., Larson, Martin G.·2016·Circulation: Heart Failure

Abstract

Background—: Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent and deadly disease, and preventive strategies focused on at-risk individuals are needed. Current HF prediction models have not examined HF subtypes. We sought to develop and validate risk prediction models for HF with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF, HFrEF). Methods and Results—: Of 28,820 participants from 4 community-based cohorts, 982 developed incident HFpEF and 909 HFrEF during a median follow-up of 12 years. Three cohorts were combined, and a 2:1 random split was used for derivation and internal validation, with the fourth cohort as external validation. Models accounted for multiple competing risks (death, other HF subtype, and unclassified HF). The HFpEF-specific model included age, sex, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, antihypertensive treatment, and previous myocardial infarction; it had good discrimination in derivation (c-statistic 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–0.82) and validation samples (internal: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77–0.82 and external: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.71–0.80). The HFrEF-specific model additionally included smoking, left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle branch block, and diabetes mellitus; it had good discrimination in derivation (c-statistic 0.82; 95% CI, 0.80–0.84) and validation samples (internal: 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78–0.83 and external: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.71–0.80). Age was more strongly associated with HFpEF, and male sex, left ventricular hypertrophy, bundle branch block, previous myocardial infarction, and smoking with HFrEF ( P value for each comparison ≤0.02). Conclusions—: We describe and validate risk prediction models for HF subtypes and show good discrimination in a large sample. Some risk factors differed between HFpEF and HFrEF, supporting the notion of pathogenetic differences among HF subtypes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circheartfailure.115.003116

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Ho, J. E., Enserro, D., Brouwers, F. P., Kizer, J. R., Shah, S. J., Psaty, B. M., Bartz, T. M., Santhanakrishnan, R., Lee, D. S., Chan, C., Liu, K., Blaha, M. J., Hillege, H. L., van der Harst, P., van Gilst, W. H., Kop, W. J., Gansevoort, R. T., Vasan, R. S., Gardin, J. M., Levy, D., Gottdiener, J. S., de Boer, R. A., & Larson, M. G.
Venue
Circulation: Heart Failure
Published
2016-06
Volume
9
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3297
OpenAlex
W2556053991
Cited by
362
References
7
FWCI
16.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: The International Collaboration on Heart Failure Subtypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circheartfailure.115.003116
The paper
Ho, J. E., Enserro, D., Brouwers, F. P., Kizer, J. R., Shah, S. J., Psaty, B. M., Bartz, T. M., Santhanakrishnan, R., Lee, D. S., Chan, C., Liu, K., Blaha, M. J., Hillege, H. L., van der Harst, P., van Gilst, W. H., Kop, W. J., Gansevoort, R. T., Vasan, R. S., Gardin, J. M., . . . Larson, M. G. (2016). Predicting Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: The International Collaboration on Heart Failure Subtypes. Circulation: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.115.003116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.