Cited by 229Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

The Epidemiology of Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Implications for Screening

Wang, Thomas J., Levy, Daniel, Benjamin, Emelia J., Vasan, Ramachandran S.·2003·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Congestive heart failure is a progressive disorder that is frequently preceded by asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We reviewed the epidemiology, diagnosis, and natural history of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and evaluated community-wide screening for this condition as a potential strategy to reduce the incidence of heart failure. Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction has an estimated prevalence of 3% to 6%, and is at least as common in the community as systolic heart failure. Because it often occurs in the absence of known cardiovascular disease, this condition may go unrecognized and undertreated. In randomized trials, individuals with asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction have high rates of incident heart failure and death. However, little is known about the prognosis of individuals with this condition in the community, who have a substantially lower prevalence of myocardial infarction, have milder degrees of systolic dysfunction, and are older than patients enrolled in clinical trials. Current evidence is inadequate to support community-wide screening for asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, either with echocardiography or with assays for natriuretic peptides. Given the increasing prevalence of heart failure, additional studies are needed to develop effective strategies to detect and optimally manage individuals with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in the community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00012

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T. J., Levy, D., Benjamin, E. J., & Vasan, R. S.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2003-06-03
Volume
138
Issue
11
Pages
907-916
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1489075861
Cited by
229
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24-HL-04334-01A1, N01‐HC25195, 1U01 HL 66582, U01HL066582, K24HL004334)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
congestive heart failure, heart failure screening, prevalence, natural history (disease), prognosis, echocardiography, natriuretic peptides, heart failure incidence, mortality
MeSH terms
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Research, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review