Cited by 292Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Comparative Tolerability and Harms of Individual Statins: A Study-Level Network Meta-Analysis of 246 955 Participants From 135 Randomized, Controlled Trials

Open access
Naci, Huseyin, Brugts, Jasper, Ades, Tony·2013·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background—: Our objective was to estimate the comparative harms of individual statins using both placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials. Methods and Results—: We systematically reviewed randomized trials evaluating different statins in participants with and without cardiovascular disease. We performed random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses to quantify the relative harms of individual statins. We included 55 two-armed placebo-controlled and 80 two- or multiarmed active-comparator trials including 246 955 individuals. According to pairwise meta-analyses, individual statins were not different than control in terms of myalgia, creatine kinase elevation, cancer, and discontinuations because of adverse events. Statins as a class resulted in significantly higher odds of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.16) and transaminase elevations (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.24–1.84) compared with control. When individual statins were compared in network meta-analyses, there were numerous statistically detectable differences, favoring simvastatin and pravastatin. According to dose-level comparisons, individual statins resulted in higher odds of discontinuations with higher doses of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. Similarly, higher doses of atorvasatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin were associated with higher odds of transaminase elevations. Simvastatin at its highest doses was associated with creatine kinase elevations (odds ratio, 4.14; 95% credible interval, 1.08–16.24). Meta-regression analyses adjusting for study-level age at baseline, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and publication year did not explain heterogeneity. There was no detectable inconsistency in the network. Conclusions—: As a class, adverse events associated with statin therapy are not common. Statins are not associated with cancer risk but do result in a higher odds of diabetes mellitus. Among individual statins, simvastatin and pravastatin seem safer and more tolerable than other statins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.111.000071

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one study the baseline myalgia scores varied by almost 25%, and by 5-10% in two others.

    “In one study the baseline scores varied by almost 25% [24] and by 5-10% in two others [6,11].”

    From Effect of Coenzyme Q10 on statin-associated myalgia and adherence to statin therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

    The citation to this paper is attached to the claim that baseline scores varied by almost 25%; the 5–10% claim cites other sources. The Myalgia section reports myalgia incidence and treatment comparisons, not baseline myalgia scores. Searches for baseline-score variation and 25% found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For dementia, hepatic steatosis, venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, and polycystic ovary syndrome, no effect of statins has been reliably demonstrated.

    “Other conditions, such as dementia [224], hepatic steatosis [225], venous thromboembolism [226], atrial fibrillation [227,228], and polycystic ovary syndrome [229] have also been studied, and no effect of statins on these conditions has been reliably demonstrated.”
  • In meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, no increased frequency of myalgia in statin-treated groups has been shown.

    “In meta-analyses of RCTs, no increased frequency in statin-treated groups has been shown. 213,214”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [214]

  • In meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, no increased frequency of muscle-related adverse effects has been shown in statin-treated groups.

    “In meta-analyses of RCTs, no increased frequency in statin-treated groups has been shown.213,214”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [214]

  • A systematic review found that the incidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity in patients taking statins is unknown, with very few cases occurring in large-scale randomized controlled trials.

    “A systematic review found that the incidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity in patients taking statins is unknown, with very few cases occurring in large-scale RCTs.212,214”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [214]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Naci H, Brugts J, Fleurence R, Ades AE. Comparative efficacy and safety of statins: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison- final protocol. 2009; www2.lse.ac.uk/LSEHealthAndSocialCare/pdf/ HNaciProtocol.pdf. Accessed April 5, 2013.
  2. Chong PH. Lack of therapeutic interchangeability of HMG-CoA reduc- tase inhibitors. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:1907-1917.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naci, H., Brugts, J., & Ades, T.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • From the LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom (H.N.); Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (J.B.); and .School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (T.A.).
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2013-07
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
390-399
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2160313369
Cited by
292
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 8
FWCI
34.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
McMaster University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
statins, statin safety, tolerability, diabetes mellitus, transaminase elevation, creatine kinase elevation, myalgia, cancer risk, simvastatin, pravastatin, dose-response relationship, cardiovascular disease
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Lipids, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Evidence-Based Medicine, Dyslipidemias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review