Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 620

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Open access
Wang, Lu, Song, Yiqing, Manson, JoAnn E., Pilz, Stefan, März, Winfried, Michaëlsson, Karl, Lundqvist, Annamari, Jassal, Simerjot K., Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth, Zhang, Cuilin, Eaton, Charles B., May, Heidi T., Anderson, Jeffrey L., Sesso, Howard D.·2012·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background—: Vitamin D status has been linked to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the optimal 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]-vitamin D) levels for potential cardiovascular health benefits remain unclear. Methods and Results—: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through February 2012 for prospective studies that assessed the association of 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations with CVD risk. A total of 24 articles met our inclusion criteria, from which 19 independent studies with 6123 CVD cases in 65 994 participants were included for a meta-analysis. In a comparison of the lowest with the highest 25(OH)-vitamin D categories, the pooled relative risk was 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.30–1.77) for total CVD, 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.19–1.71) for CVD mortality, 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.21–1.57) for coronary heart disease, and 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 1.27–2.10) for stroke. These associations remained strong and significant when analyses were limited to studies that excluded participants with baseline CVD and were better controlled for season and confounding. We used a fractional polynomial spline regression analysis to assess the linearity of dose–response association between continuous 25(OH)-vitamin D and CVD risk. The CVD risk increased monotonically across decreasing 25(OH)-vitamin D below ≈60 nmol/L, with a relative risk of 1.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.06) per 25-nmol/L decrement in 25(OH)-vitamin D. Conclusions—: This meta-analysis demonstrated a generally linear, inverse association between circulating 25(OH)-vitamin D ranging from 20 to 60 nmol/L and risk of CVD. Further research is needed to clarify the association of 25(OH)-vitamin D higher than 60 nmol/L with CVD risk and assess causality of the observed associations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.112.967604

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Song, Y., Manson, J. E., Pilz, S., März, W., Michaëlsson, K., Lundqvist, A., Jassal, S. K., Barrett-Connor, E., Zhang, C., Eaton, C. B., May, H. T., Anderson, J. L., & Sesso, H. D.
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2012-11
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
819-829
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2135487574
Cited by
620
References
5
FWCI
36.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.