Cited by 23Health disparities and outcomesCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsResilience and Mental Health

Individual Psychosocial Resilience, Neighborhood Context, and Cardiovascular Health in Black Adults: A Multilevel Investigation From the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular Center for Health Equity Study

Open access
Kim, Jeong Hwan, Islam, Shabatun J., Topel, Matthew L., Ko, Yi-An, Mujahid, Mahasin S., Vaccarino, Viola, Liu, Chang, Sims, Mario +8 more·2020·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Despite well-documented cardiovascular disparities between racial groups, within-race determinants of cardiovascular health among Black adults remain understudied. Factors promoting cardiovascular resilience among Black adults in particular warrant further investigation. Our objective was to examine whether individual psychosocial resilience and neighborhood-level cardiovascular resilience were associated with better cardiovascular health in Black adults, measured utilizing Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) scores. Methods: We assessed LS7 scores in 389 Black adults (mean age, 53±10 years; 39% men) living in Atlanta, Georgia. A composite score of individual psychosocial resilience was created by assessing environmental mastery, purpose in life, optimism, resilient coping, and depressive symptoms. Neighborhood-level cardiovascular resilience was separately determined by the census tract-level rates of cardiovascular mortality/morbidity events. Generalized linear mixed regression models were used to examine the association between individual psychosocial resilience, neighborhood cardiovascular resilience, and LS7 scores. Results: Higher individual psychosocial resilience was significantly associated with higher LS7 (β=0.38 [0.16–0.59] per 1 SD) after adjustment for sociodemographic factors. Similarly, higher neighborhood-level cardiovascular resilience was significantly associated with higher LS7 (β=0.23 [0.02–0.45] per 1 SD). When jointly examined, high individual psychosocial resilience (>median) was independently associated with higher LS7 (β=0.73 [0.31–1.17]), whereas living in high-resilience neighborhoods (>median) was not. The largest difference in LS7 score was between those with high and low psychosocial resilience living in low-resilience neighborhoods (8.38 [7.90–8.86] versus 7.42 [7.04–7.79]). Conclusions: Individual psychosocial resilience in Black adults is associated with better cardiovascular health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006638

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J. H., Islam, S. J., Topel, M. L., Ko, Y.-A., Mujahid, M. S., Vaccarino, V., Liu, C., Sims, M., Mubasher, M., Searles, C. D., Dunbar, S. B., Pemu, P., Taylor, H. A., Quyyumi, A. A., Baltrus, P., & Lewis, T. T.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2020-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
e006638-e006638
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W3092019280
Cited by
23
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007745, R01HL130471, T32HL130025)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR070898)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
psychosocial resilience, cardiovascular health, Black people, neighborhood context, Life's Essential 8, environmental mastery, meaning of life, optimism, resilient coping, depressive symptoms, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Healthy Lifestyle, Race Factors, Adult, Black or African American, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Georgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction Behavior, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities, Resilience, Psychological, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review