Cited by 245Cardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Benefits and Risks of Corticosteroid Prophylaxis in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Ho, Kwok M., Tan, Jen Aik·2009·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac surgery are associated with a significant systemic inflammatory response that may increase postoperative complications. This meta-analysis assessed whether the benefits and risks of corticosteroid use were dose dependent in adult cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized controlled trials of the use of corticosteroid prophylaxis in adult cardiac surgery (>18 years of age) requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were selected from MEDLINE (1966 to August 1, 2008), EMBASE (1988 to August 1, 2008), and the Cochrane controlled trials register without any language restrictions. A total of 3323 patients from 50 randomized controlled trials were identified and subject to meta-analysis. Corticosteroid prophylaxis reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation (25.1% versus 35.1%; number needed to treat, 10; relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.86; P<0.01) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (weighted mean difference, -0.37 days; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.52; P<0.01) and hospital (weighted mean difference, -0.66 days; 95% CI, -0.77 to -1.25; P=0.03) compared with placebo. The use of corticosteroid was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause infection (relative risk, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.41; P=0.73), but hyperglycemia requiring insulin infusion after corticosteroid prophylaxis was common (28.2%; relative risk, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.01; P<0.01). No additional benefits were found on all outcomes beyond a total dose of 1000 mg hydrocortisone, and very high doses of corticosteroid were associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that low-dose corticosteroid is as effective as high-dose corticosteroid in reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation and duration of mechanical ventilation but with fewer potential side effects in adult cardiac surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.108.848218

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Matthews JN, Altman DG. Interaction 3: How to examine heterogeneity. BMJ 1996;313:862.
  2. Abd El-Hakeem EE, El-Minshawy AM. Influence of dexamethasone on cytokine balance in patients undergoing valve replacement surgery. Eg J Anaesth. 2003;19:205-214.
  3. Abd El-Hakeem EE, Zareh ZE. Effects of dexamethasone on the incidence of shivering and recovery in patients undergoing valve replacement surgery. Egypt J Anaesth. 2003;19:361-70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, K. M., & Tan, J. A.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2009-04-14
Volume
119
Issue
14
Pages
1853-1866
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2038504749
Cited by
245
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
corticosteroid prophylaxis, cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, cortisol, dose dependence, atrial fibrillation, postoperative complications, systemic inflammatory response, length of hospital stay, infection risk, hyperglycemia, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Inflammation, Intraoperative Complications, Length of Stay, Postoperative Complications, Reperfusion Injury, Survival Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review