The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Pilot Study
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Hypertension is associated with impaired glucose metabolism and insulin resistance. Chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system may contribute to either condition. We investigated the effect of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation on glucose metabolism and blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Methods and Results—: We enrolled 50 patients with therapy-resistant hypertension. Thirty-seven patients underwent bilateral catheter-based renal denervation, and 13 patients were assigned to a control group. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, fasting glucose, insulin, C peptide, hemoglobin A 1c , calculated insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance), and glucose levels during oral glucose tolerance test were measured before and 1 and 3 months after treatment. Mean office blood pressure at baseline was 178/96±3/2 mm Hg. At 1 and 3 months, office blood pressure was reduced by −28/−10 mm Hg ( P <0.001) and −32/−12 mm Hg ( P <0.001), respectively, in the treatment group, without changes in concurrent antihypertensive treatment. Three months after renal denervation, fasting glucose was reduced from 118±3.4 to 108±3.8 mg/dL ( P =0.039). Insulin levels were decreased from 20.8±3.0 to 9.3±2.5 μIU/mL ( P =0.006) and C-peptide levels from 5.3±0.6 to 3.0±0.9 ng/mL ( P =0.002). After 3 months, homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance decreased from 6.0±0.9 to 2.4±0.8 ( P =0.001). Additionally, mean 2-hour glucose levels during oral glucose tolerance test were reduced significantly by 27 mg/dL ( P =0.012). There were no significant changes in blood pressure or metabolic markers in the control group. Conclusions—: Renal denervation improves glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity in addition to a significantly reducing blood pressure. However, this improvement appeared to be unrelated to changes in drug treatment. This novel procedure may therefore provide protection in patients with resistant hypertension and metabolic disorders at high cardiovascular risk. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT00664638 and NCT00888433.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matthews, D. R., Hosker, J. P., Rudenski, A. S., Naylor, B. A., Treacher, D. F., & Turner, R. C. (1985) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00280883 · Cited by 31,502
Chobanian, A. V. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2560 · Cited by 25,386
Levey, A. S., Bosch, J. P., Lewis, J. B., Greene, T., Rogers, N., Roth, D., & for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group* (1999) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 · Cited by 15,079
The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60484-9 · Cited by 5,125
Katz, A., Nambi, S. S., Mather, K., Baron, A. D., Follmann, D. A., Sullivan, G., & Quon, M. J. (2000) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.85.7.6661 · Cited by 3,931
International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes
The International Expert Committee (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-9033 · Cited by 3,185
Krum, H., Schlaich, M., Whitbourn, R., Sobotka, P. A., Sadowski, J., Bartus, K., Kapelak, B., Walton, A., Sievert, H., Thambar, S., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60566-3 · Cited by 2,108
Self-citationLaakso, M., Edelman, S. V., Brechtel, G., & Baron, A. D. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci114644 · Cited by 930
CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE RISK AND IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE The Whitehall Study
Fuller, J., Shipley, M., Rose, G., Jarrett, R. J., & Keen, H. (1980) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92651-3 · Cited by 783
Cited by
(2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,655
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Self-citationMechanisms of Diabetic Complications
Forbes, J. M., & Cooper, M. E. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00045.2011 · Cited by 2,890
Stener-Victorin, E., Teede, H., Norman, R. J., Legro, R., Goodarzi, M. O., Dokras, A., Laven, J., Hoeger, K., & Piltonen, T. T. (2024) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-024-00511-3 · Cited by 495
Witkowski, A., Prejbisz, A., Florczak, E., Kądziela, J., Śliwiński, P., Bieleń, P., Michałowska, I., Kabat, M., Warchoł, E., Januszewicz, M., et al. (2011) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.173799 · Cited by 460
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahfoud, F., Schlaich, M., Kindermann, I., Ukena, C., Cremers, B., Brandt, M. C., Hoppe, U. C., Vonend, O., Rump, L. C., Sobotka, P. A., Krum, H., Esler, M., & Böhm, M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2011-05-10
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1940-1946
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2149207625
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 67.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Pilot Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.110.991869
- The paper
- Mahfoud, F., Schlaich, M., Kindermann, I., Ukena, C., Cremers, B., Brandt, M. C., Hoppe, U. C., Vonend, O., Rump, L. C., Sobotka, P. A., Krum, H., Esler, M., & Böhm, M. (2011). Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Pilot Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.991869
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.