Cited by 461Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases

Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations, Rosuvastatin Therapy, and Residual Vascular Risk: An Analysis From the JUPITER Trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin)

Open access
Khera, Amit V., Everett, Brendan M., Caulfield, Michael P., Hantash, Feras M., Wohlgemuth, Jay, Ridker, Paul M, Mora, Samia·2014·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a low-density lipoprotein–like particle largely independent of known risk factors and predictive of cardiovascular disease. Statins may offset the risk associated with elevated Lp(a), but it is unknown whether Lp(a) is a determinant of residual risk in the setting of low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after potent statin therapy. Methods and Results—: Baseline and on-treatment Lp(a) concentrations were assessed in 9612 multiethnic participants in the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) before and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo, with outcomes reported for whites (n=7746). Lp(a) concentrations (median [25th–75th percentile], in nmol/L) were highest in blacks (60 [34–100]), then Asians (38 [18–60]), Hispanics (24 [11–46]), and whites (23 [10–50]; P <0.001). Although the median change in Lp(a) with rosuvastatin and placebo was zero, rosuvastatin nonetheless resulted in a small but statistically significant positive shift in the overall Lp(a) distribution ( P <0.0001). Baseline Lp(a) concentrations were associated with incident cardiovascular disease (adjusted hazard ratio per 1-SD increment in Ln[Lp(a)], 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.34; P =0.02). Similarly, on-statin Lp(a) concentrations were associated with residual risk of cardiovascular disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.59; P =0.04), which was independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other factors. Rosuvastatin significantly reduced incident cardiovascular disease among participants with baseline Lp(a) greater than or equal to the median (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.43–0.90) and Lp(a) less than the median (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.72), with no evidence of interaction. Similar results were obtained when analyses included nonwhites. Conclusion—: Among white JUPITER participants treated with potent statin therapy, Lp(a) was a significant determinant of residual risk. The magnitude of relative risk reduction with rosuvastatin was similar among participants with high or low Lp(a). Clinical Trials Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00239681.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.113.004406

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]28. Merck announces HPS2-THRIVE Study of TREDAPTIVE (extended- release niacin/laropiprant) did not achieve primary endpoint [news release]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck; December 20, 2012. http:// www.mercknewsroom.com/press-release/prescription-medicine-news/ merck-announces-hps2-thrive-study-tredaptive-extended-relea. Accessed January 11, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khera, A. V., Everett, B. M., Caulfield, M. P., Hantash, F. M., Wohlgemuth, J., Ridker, P. M., & Mora, S.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2014-02-11
Volume
129
Issue
6
Pages
635-642
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2169920876
Cited by
461
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14
FWCI
25.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Quest Diagnostics
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL117861)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
lipoprotein(a), rosuvastatin, residual cardiovascular risk, statin therapy, cardiovascular disease prevention, low LDL cholesterol, JUPITER trial, non-white populations, cardiovascular risk stratification, LDL-C lowering therapy, cardiovascular risk reduction
MeSH terms
Rosuvastatin Calcium, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluorobenzenes, Follow-Up Studies, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Pyrimidines, Risk Factors, Sulfonamides, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Lipoprotein(a), Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review