Cited by 276Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

LDL cholesterol: controversies and future therapeutic directions

Ridker, Paul M·2014·The Lancet

Abstract

Lifelong exposure to raised concentrations of LDL cholesterol increases cardiovascular event rates, and the use of statin therapy as an adjunct to diet, exercise, and smoking cessation has proven highly effective in reducing the population burden associated with hyperlipidaemia. Yet, despite consistent biological, genetic, and epidemiological data, and evidence from randomised trials, there is controversy among national guidelines and clinical practice with regard to LDL cholesterol, its measurement, the usefulness of population-based screening, the net benefit-to-risk ratio for different LDL-lowering drugs, the benefit of treatment targets, and whether aggressive lowering of LDL is safe. Several novel therapies have been introduced for the treatment of people with genetic defects that result in loss of function within the LDL receptor, a major determinant of inherited hyperlipidaemias. Moreover, the usefulness of monoclonal antibodies that extend the LDL-receptor lifecycle (and thus result in substantial lowering of LDL cholesterol below the levels achieved with statins alone) is being assessed in phase 3 trials that will enrol more than 60,000 at-risk patients worldwide. These trials represent an exceptionally rapid translation of genetic observations into clinical practice and will address core questions of how low LDL cholesterol can be safely reduced, whether the mechanism of LDL-cholesterol lowering matters, and whether ever more aggressive lipid-lowering provides a safe, long-term mechanism to prevent atherothrombotic complications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61009-6

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Novel methods of reducing LDL-C such as mipomersen, lomitapide, and PCSK9 inhibitors have limitations due to hepatotoxicity, high cost, inconvenience, and lack of availability outside tertiary referral centers.

    “However, their hepatotoxicity, high cost, inconvenience, and a general lack of availability outside the tertiary referral centers imply that their use is limited [10].”

    From Effects of aerobic exercise on lipids and lipoproteins (2017) · cites this paper as [10]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ridker, P. M.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ridker, Paul M
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
384
Issue
9943
Pages
607-617
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2058652637
Cited by
274
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
LDL cholesterol, hyperlipidemia, statin therapy, LDL receptor, PCSK9 inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, LDL cholesterol measurement, mass screening, treatment goals, cardiovascular risk, atherothrombotic complications
MeSH terms
Animals, Hypolipidemic Agents, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Cholesterol, LDL, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review