Cited by 80Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Vorapaxar in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Previous Myocardial Infarction: Findings From the Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events-TIMI 50 Trial

Open access
Cavender, Matthew A., Scirica, Benjamin M., Bonaca, Marc P., Angiolillo, Dominick J., Dalby, Anthony J., Dellborg, Mikael, Morais, Joao, Murphy, Sabina A. +4 more·2015·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Vorapaxar reduces cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in patients with previous MI while increasing bleeding. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of recurrent thrombotic events despite standard therapy and may derive particular benefit from antithrombotic therapies. The Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events-TIMI 50 trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vorapaxar in patients with stable atherosclerosis. Methods and Results—: We examined the efficacy of vorapaxar in patients with and without DM who qualified for the trial with a previous MI. Because vorapaxar is contraindicated in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, the analysis (n=16 896) excluded such patients. The primary end point of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke occurred more frequently in patients with DM than in patients without DM (rates in placebo group: 14.3% versus 7.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.47; P <0.001). In patients with DM (n=3623), vorapaxar significantly reduced the primary end point (11.4% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.89]; P =0.002) with a number needed to treat to avoid 1 major cardiovascular event of 29. The incidence of moderate/severe bleeding was increased with vorapaxar in patients with DM (4.4% versus 2.6%; hazard ratio, 1.60 [95% confidence interval, 1.07–2.40]). However, net clinical outcome integrating these 2 end points (efficacy and safety) was improved with vorapaxar (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.93]). Conclusions—: In patients with previous MI and DM, the addition of vorapaxar to standard therapy significantly reduced the risk of major vascular events with greater potential for absolute benefit in this group at high risk of recurrent ischemic events. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00526474.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.114.013774

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavender, M. A., Scirica, B. M., Bonaca, M. P., Angiolillo, D. J., Dalby, A. J., Dellborg, M., Morais, J., Murphy, S. A., Ophuis, T. O., Tendera, M., Braunwald, E., & Morrow, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • From TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.A.C., B.M.S., M.P.B., S.A.M., E.B., D.A.M.); University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville (D.J.A.); Milpark Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa (A.J.D.); Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.D.); Santo Andre’s Hospital, Leiria, Portugal (J.M.); Department of Cardiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The...
Corresponding author
Morrow, David A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2015-03-24
Volume
131
Issue
12
Pages
1047-1053
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2086976004
Cited by
80
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14
FWCI
12.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
vorapaxar, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, thrombin receptor antagonist, secondary prevention, major adverse cardiovascular events, bleeding risk, recurrent ischemic events, net clinical benefit
MeSH terms
Aged, Death, Diabetes Mellitus, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Lactones, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Pyridines, Thrombosis, Treatment Outcome, Receptors, Thrombin, Stroke, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review