Cited by 88Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predisposition to Vasovagal Syncope in Subjects With Blood/Injury Phobia

Abstract

Background — Most subjects with blood/injury phobia experience syncope or presyncope as part of the phobic response. We tested the hypothesis that these subjects have a constitutional autonomic dysregulation that predisposes them to vasovagal syncope during head-up tilt. Methods and Results — We studied 11 subjects (9 females, 2 males) who had a history of syncope or presyncope only in response to a blood or injury stimulus and 11 healthy matched controls (10 females, 1 male) without a history of syncope. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured during a 15-minute baseline period with subjects in the supine position and then during 45 minutes of head-up tilt to 70°. Measurements at rest did not differ between the blood phobic and control subjects. During tilt, 9 (82%) of the 11 blood phobic subjects experienced presyncope or syncope, leading to termination of the study after 22±17 minutes of tilt. Only 1 (9%) of the 11 control subjects experienced presyncope (χ 2 =11.7, P =0.001). Hemodynamic responses to tilt were consistent with a vasovagal mechanism in the blood phobic subjects, with simultaneous decreases in BP and HR during tilt. During tilt, systolic BP fell by 21±15 mm Hg ( P =0.001), and HR fell by 22±25 bpm ( P =0.01). By contrast, BP and HR were very stable in the control group. Conclusions — Subjects with syncope related to blood/injury phobia have an underlying autonomic dysregulation predisposing them to neurally mediated syncope, even in the absence of any blood or injury stimulus. Fainting related to these stimuli may in large part be due to dysfunction in neural circulatory control, which may secondarily lead to the phobia because of repeated syncopal events.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc3301.094910

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1016/0010-440X(69)90022-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0021-843X.91.4.280 · DOI
  3. American Psychiatric Association. Specific phobia (formerly simple phobia).In: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders–Fourth Edition:DSM-IV Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994; 405–411.
  4. 10.1002/1097-4679(198507)41:4<451::AID-JCLP2270410402>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0033-3182(82)73073-7 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00236-7 · DOI
  7. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M et al. Specific phobia.In: Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders 1994. New York NY: Biometrics Research Department; 1996: F16–F19. · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/0005-7967(79)90041-X · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1097/00006842-198807000-00008 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1980.20681057157.x · DOI
  11. 10.1161/circ.23.6.901 · DOI
  12. 10.1136/bmj.3.5876.384 · DOI
  13. Marks IM. Fears Phobias and Rituals: Panic Anxiety and Their Disorders. New York NY: Oxford University Press; 1987.
  14. 10.1016/0031-9384(76)90100-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/h0061690 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1161/circ.98.17.1756 · DOI
  17. 10.1161/circ.98.20.2105 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Accurso, V., Winnicki, M., Shamsuzzaman, A. S. M., Wenzel, A., Johnson, A. K., & Somers, V. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • From the Department of Internal Medicine (V.A., M.W., A.S.M.S., V.K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; the Department of Psychology (A.W.), University of North Dakota, Grand Forks; and the Department of Psychology (A.K.J.), University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-08-21
Volume
104
Issue
8
Pages
903-907
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2102886201
Cited by
88
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (65176, RR00585)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL065176, R01HL061560)
  • Fogarty International Center (F05TW005463, F05TW005399)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000585)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
vasovagal syncope, autonomic dysfunction, head-up tilt, presyncope, blood pressure, heart rate, hemodynamic response
MeSH terms
Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Posture, Body Mass Index, Tilt-Table Test, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review