Cited by 142Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Sustained Sympathetic and Blood Pressure Reduction 1 Year After Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

Hering, Dagmara, Marusic, Petra, Walton, Antony S., Lambert, Elisabeth A., Krum, Henry, Narkiewicz, Krzysztof, Lambert, Gavin W., Esler, Murray D. +1 more·2014·Hypertension

Abstract

Renal denervation (RDN) reduces muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and blood pressure (BP) in resistant hypertension. Although a persistent BP-lowering effect has been demonstrated, the long-term effect on MSNA remains elusive. We investigated whether RDN influences MSNA over time. Office BP and MSNA were obtained at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after RDN in 35 patients with resistant hypertension. Office BP averaged 166±22/88±19 mm Hg, despite the use of an average of 4.8±2.1 antihypertensive drugs. Baseline MSNA was 51±11 bursts/min ≈2- to 3-fold higher than the level observed in healthy controls. Mean office systolic and diastolic BP significantly decreased by –12.6±18.3/–6.5±9.2, –16.1±25.6/–8.6±12.9, and –21.2±29.1/–11.1±12.9 mm Hg ( P <0.001 for both systolic BP and diastolic BP) with RDN at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, respectively. MSNA was reduced by –8±12, –6±12, and –6±11 bursts/min ( P <0.01) at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. The reduction in MSNA was maintained, despite a progressive fall in BP over time. No such changes were observed in 7 control subjects at 6-month follow-up. These findings confirm previous reports on the favorable effects of RDN on elevated BP and demonstrate sustained reduction of central sympathetic outflow ≤1-year follow-up in patients with resistant hypertension and high baseline MSNA. These observations are compatible with the hypothesis of a substantial contribution of afferent renal nerve signaling to increased BP in resistant hypertension and argue against a relevant reinnervation at 1 year after procedure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.03098

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the SYMPLICITY HTN clinical trials, renal denervation decreased 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic blood pressure by −11/−7 mmHg.

    “In the SYMPLICITY HTN clinical trials, RDN also decreased 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic BP by −11/−7mmHg 164.”
  • In overweight or obese patients with resistant hypertension, catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation lowered office systolic/diastolic blood pressure by −25 to −30/−10 to −12 mmHg for up to 24 months.

    “In overweight or obese patients with resistant hypertension, catheter-based radiofrequency RDN lowered office systolic/diastolic BP by −25 to −30/−10 to −12 mmHg for up to 24 months164.”
  • Similar results have been found in obese humans with resistant hypertension in which catheter-based radiofrequency RDN consistently lowered office BP by 25-30 mmHg systolic BP and 10-12 mmHg diastolic BP for up to 24 months.

    “Similar results have been found in obese humans with resistant hypertension in which catheter-based radiofrequency RDN consistently lowered office BP by 25–30 mmHg systolic BP and 10–12 mmHg diastolic BP for up to 24 months70,71.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hering, D., Marusic, P., Walton, A. S., Lambert, E. A., Krum, H., Narkiewicz, K., Lambert, G. W., Esler, M. D., & Schlaich, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • From the Neurovascular Hypertension and Kidney Disease Laboratory, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia (D.H., P.M., E.A.L., G.W.L., M.D.E., M.P.S.); Department of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland (D.H., K.N.); Heart Centre Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (A.S.W., H.K., M.D.E., M.P.S.); and Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (E.A.L., G.W.L., M.P.S.) and Department of Epidemiology and...
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2014-07
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
118-124
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2100734162
Cited by
142
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 13
FWCI
18.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
renal denervation, resistant hypertension, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, blood pressure reduction, central sympathetic outflow, long-term follow-up, reinnervation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Denervation, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Male, Middle Aged, Sympathectomy, Sympathetic Nervous System, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review