Cited by 45Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPhysical Activity and Health

Exercise Systolic Blood Pressure at Moderate Workload Is Linearly Associated With Coronary Disease Risk in Healthy Men

Open access
Mariampillai, Julian E., Liestøl, Knut, Kjeldsen, Sverre E., Prestgaard, Erik E., Engeseth, Kristian, Bodegard, Johan, Berge, Eivind, Gjesdal, Knut +3 more·2020·Hypertension

Abstract

There is no consensus on the definition of an exaggerated increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise. The aim was to explore a potential threshold for exercise SBP associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease in healthy men using repeated exercise testing. Two thousand fourteen healthy white male employees were recruited into the Oslo Ischemia Study during early 1970s. At follow-up 7 years later, 1392 men were still considered healthy. A bicycle exercise test at 100 W workload was performed at both visits. Cox regression analyses were performed with increasing cutoff levels of peak exercise SBP at 100 W workload (SBP100W) from 160 mm Hg to 200 mm Hg, adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and physical fitness. Participants with SBP100W below cutoff level at both baseline and first follow-up were compared with participants with SBP100W equal to or above cutoff level at both visits. Compared with participants with SBP100W below all cutoff levels between 165 and 195 mm Hg, coronary heart disease risk was increased among participants with SBP100W equal to or above cutoff at all levels. There was no evidence of a distinct threshold level for coronary heart disease risk, and the relation between SBP100W and coronary heart disease appears linear. When investigating exercise SBP at moderate workload measured at 2 exercise tests in healthy middle-aged white men, there is increasing risk of coronary heart disease with increasing exercise SBP independent of SBP at rest. The association is linear from the low range of exercise SBP, and there is no sign of a distinct threshold level for increased coronary disease risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.13528

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exaggerated exercise blood pressure (EEBP) recorded during clinical exercise testing is independently associated with blood pressure-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes.

    “Exaggerated exercise blood pressure recorded during clinical exercise testing is independently associated with blood pressure -related cardiovascular disease outcomes”
  • Subsequent meta-analysis and other longitudinal studies have confirmed the association between submaximal exercise systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular events and death.

    “A subsequent meta-analysis (10), and other longitudinal studies (7,8), have since confirmed these results.”
  • Mariampillai et al. described a linear association between submaximal exercise systolic BP (recorded at 100 watts) and coronary artery disease risk beyond a systolic BP value of 165 mmHg.

    “Mariampillai et al [7] recently described a linear association between submaximal exercise systolic BP (recorded at a workload of 100 watts) and coronary artery disease risk beyond a systolic BP value of 165 mmHg.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mariampillai, J. E., Liestøl, K., Kjeldsen, S. E., Prestgaard, E. E., Engeseth, K., Bodegard, J., Berge, E., Gjesdal, K., Erikssen, J., Grundvold, I., & Skretteberg, P. T.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • From the Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway (J.E.M., S.E.K., E.E.P., K.E., J.B., E.B., I.G., P.T.S.)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2020-01
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
44-50
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2984461912
Cited by
45
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
coronary heart disease risk, linear association, blood pressure thresholds, cardiovascular risk factors, physical fitness
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Coronary Disease, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review