Cited by 93Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

Cardiovascular Event Risks Associated With Masked Nocturnal Hypertension Defined by Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in the J-HOP Nocturnal Blood Pressure Study

Fujiwara, Takeshi, Hoshide, Satoshi, Kanegae, Hiroshi, Kario, Kazuomi·2020·Hypertension

Abstract

There is no information regarding the potential association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) event risks and masked nocturnal hypertension defined by home blood pressure (BP) monitoring. We sought to examine this association in a general practice population. For this purpose, we used data from the J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure) Nocturnal BP Study, which recruited 2745 high-cardiovascular-risk participants (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [10.4] years; 48.7% men; 82.7% on antihypertensive medications). Nocturnal home BPs (HBPs) were measured at 2:00, 3:00, and 4:00 AM using a validated, automated HBP device for 14 consecutive days. The average (SD) of nocturnal HBP measures was 17.1 (13.5). The percentages of participants with controlled BP (nocturnal HBP <120/70 mm Hg and average morning and evening BP <135/85 mm Hg), daytime hypertension (nocturnal HBP <120/70 mm Hg and average morning and evening BP ≥135/85 mm Hg), masked nocturnal hypertension (nocturnal HBP ≥120/70 mm Hg and average morning and evening BP <135/85 mm Hg), and sustained hypertension (nocturnal HBP ≥120/70 mm Hg and average morning and evening BP ≥135/85 mm Hg) were 31.7%, 7.9%, 26.7%, and 33.7%, respectively. During a median 7.6-year follow-up (19 519 person-years), 162 CVD events occurred. The cumulative incidence of CVD events was higher in those with masked nocturnal hypertension and sustained hypertension than in the controlled BP group. Results from Cox models suggested that masked nocturnal hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.00–2.46]) and sustained hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.26–3.06]) were associated with increased risk of CVD events. Participants with masked nocturnal hypertension defined by HBP monitoring are at high risk of future CVD events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.14790

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fujiwara, T., Hoshide, S., Kanegae, H., & Kario, K.
Affiliations
Jichi Medical University (JP)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2020-07
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
259-266
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W3033494509
Cited by
93
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
home blood pressure monitoring, cardiovascular events, sustained hypertension, cardiovascular risk, antihypertensive drugs, hypertension control, general practice population, automated blood pressure devices
MeSH terms
Heart Disease Risk Factors, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Japan, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Masked Hypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review