Cited by 10Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Optimal continuous positive airway pressure treatment of obstructive sleep apnea reduces daytime resting heart rate in prediabetes: a randomized controlled study

Open access
Pamidi, Sushmita, Chapotot, Florian, Wroblewski, Kristen, Whitmore, Harry, Polonsky, Tamar, Tasali, Esra·2020·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background It has been widely recognized that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is linked to cardiovascular disease. Yet, randomized controlled studies failed to demonstrate a clear cardiovascular benefit from OSA treatment, mainly because of poor adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). To date, no prior study has assessed the effect of CPAP treatment on daytime resting heart rate, a strong predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. Methods and Results We conducted a randomized controlled study in 39 participants with OSA and prediabetes, who received either in‐laboratory all‐night (ie, optimal) CPAP or an oral placebo for 2 weeks. During daytime, participants continued daily activities outside the laboratory. Resting heart rate was continuously assessed over 19 consecutive days and nights using an ambulatory device consisting of a single‐lead ECG and triaxis accelerometer. Compared with placebo, CPAP reduced daytime resting heart rate (treatment difference, −4.1 beats/min; 95% CI, −6.5 to −1.7 beats/min; P =0.002). The magnitude of reduction in daytime resting heart rate after treatment significantly correlated with the magnitude of decrease in plasma norepinephrine, a marker of sympathetic activity ( r =0.44; P =0.02), and the magnitude of decrease in OSA severity (ie, apnea‐hypopnea index [ r =0.48; P =0.005], oxygen desaturation index [ r =0.50; P =0.003], and microarousal index [ r =0.57; P <0.001]). Conclusions This proof‐of‐concept randomized controlled study demonstrates, for the first time, that CPAP treatment, when optimally used at night, reduces resting heart rate during the day, and therefore has positive cardiovascular carry over effects. These findings suggest that better identification and treatment of OSA may have important clinical implications for cardiovascular disease prevention. Registration URL: https:/// www.clini​caltr​ials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01156116.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.120.016871

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with OSA typically have higher resting heart rate, which reduces with treatment.

    “Patients with OSA typically have higher resting heart rate (RHR), which reduces with treatment (7).”

    From Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Resting Heart Rate, and Glycemic Variability in Adults With Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Methods and Results report that two weeks of CPAP reduced daytime resting heart rate versus placebo in 39 participants with OSA and prediabetes (page unavailable). The paper does not establish that patients with OSA typically have higher resting heart rates than people without OSA, and its Discussion cautions against generalizing the treatment result to more diverse OSA populations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pamidi, S., Chapotot, F., Wroblewski, K., Whitmore, H., Polonsky, T., & Tasali, E.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • PhiTools Strasbourg France
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Pamidi, Sushmita
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2020-10-06
Volume
9
Issue
19
Pages
e016871-e016871
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089468541
Cited by
10
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Chicago
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000430)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG011412)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RC1HL100046)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013642)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure, prediabetes, norepinephrine, sympathetic activity, apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, microarousals, cardiovascular disease prevention
MeSH terms
Proof of Concept Study, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Compliance, Prediabetic State, Rest, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review