Cited by 319Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsNeuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemia

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for the Efficacy of NXY-059 in Experimental Focal Cerebral Ischaemia Is Confounded by Study Quality

Open access

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The neutral results of the SAINT II trial have again highlighted difficulties translating neuroprotective efficacy from bench to bedside. Animal studies are susceptible to study quality biases, which may lead to overstatement of efficacy. We report the impact of study quality on published estimates of the efficacy of NXY-059 in animal models of stroke. Methods— We conducted a systematic review and stratified meta-analysis of published studies describing the efficacy of NXY-059 in experimental focal cerebral ischemia. Results— Overall, NXY-059 improved infarct volume by 43.3% (95% CI, 34.7 to 52.8). Only 2 of 9 publications reported randomization, concealment of treatment allocation, and blinded outcome assessment. Studies not reporting these quality items gave substantially higher estimates of efficacy than did higher-quality studies. Conclusions— The reported efficacy of NXY-059 in animal models of stroke is confounded by low study quality. The failure of SAINT II highlights the need for substantial improvements in the design, conduct, and reporting of animal studies; journals can play an important role in this by adopting standards for animal studies similar to those agreed over 10 years ago for clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.108.515957

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1161/str.30.12.2752 · DOI
  2. 10.1161/str.32.1.190 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Macleod, M. R., van der Worp, H. B., Sena, E. S., Howells, D. W., Dirnagl, U., & Donnan, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • From Clinical Neurosciences (M.R.M., E.S.S.), University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; the Department of Neurology (H.B.v.d.W.), Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; the National Stroke Research Institute (E.S.S., D.W.H., G.A.D.), Melbourne, Australia; and the Department Neurology (U.D.), Charite Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2008-10
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
2824-2829
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2168672683
Cited by
319
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemia
Keywords
NXY-059, focal cerebral ischemia, animal models of stroke, study quality bias, infarct size, neuroprotection, translational research
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzenesulfonates, Cardiovascular Agents, Brain Ischemia, Clinical Trials as Topic, Research Design, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review