Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of Cerebral Microbleeds in the General Population: The Rotterdam Scan Study

Open access
Poels, Mariëlle M.F., Ikram, M. Arfan, van der Lugt, Aad, Hofman, Albert, Krestin, Gabriel P., Breteler, Monique M.B., Vernooij, Meike W.·2011·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: Cerebral microbleeds are frequently seen in the general elderly population, but it is unknown at what rate they occur with aging and whether once present can disappear over time. Methods—: As part of the Rotterdam Scan Study, 831 persons (mean age, 68.5 years) underwent repeated brain MRI with a mean interval of 3.4 years. We assessed determinants of incident microbleeds in relation to their location with multiple logistic regressions. Results—: Overall prevalence of microbleeds increased from 24.4% at baseline to 28.0% at follow-up. Eighty-five persons (10.2%) developed new microbleeds. Microbleeds at baseline predicted development of new microbleeds (OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 3.34 to 8.67). In only 6 persons with microbleeds at baseline, fewer microbleeds were present at the follow-up examination. Cardiovascular risk factors, presence of lacunar infarcts, and larger white matter lesion volume at baseline were all associated with incident deep or infratentorial microbleeds, whereas people with the apolipoprotein E ϵ4/ϵ4 genotype or larger white matter lesion volume had a higher risk of incident strictly lobar microbleeds. Conclusions—: Incidence of microbleeds in the general population over a 3-year interval was substantial and microbleeds rarely disappeared. Risk factors for incident microbleeds were similar to those for prevalent microbleeds and differed according to microbleed location. These results support the assessment of microbleeds on T2*-weighted MRI as a possible marker of both cerebral amyloid angiopathy and hypertensive vasculopathy progression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.110.607184

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Poels, M. M. F., Ikram, M. A., van der Lugt, A., Hofman, A., Krestin, G. P., Breteler, M. M. B., & Vernooij, M. W.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2011-03
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
656-661
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2113770731
Cited by
294
References
5
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of Cerebral Microbleeds in the General Population: The Rotterdam Scan Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.110.607184
The paper
Poels, M. M. F., Ikram, M. A., van der Lugt, A., Hofman, A., Krestin, G. P., Breteler, M. M. B., & Vernooij, M. W. (2011). Incidence of Cerebral Microbleeds in the General Population: The Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.607184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.