Cited by 144Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsReading and Literacy DevelopmentFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visualizing the Neural Bases of a Disconnection Syndrome with Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Molko, N., Cohen, L., Mangin, J. F., Chochon, F., Lehéricy, S., Bihan, D. Le, Dehaene, S.·2002·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Disconnection syndromes are often conceptualized exclusively within cognitive box-and-arrow diagrams unrelated to brain anatomy. In a patient with alexia in his left visual field resulting from a posterior callosal lesion, we illustrate how diffusion tensor imaging can reveal the anatomical bases of a disconnection syndrome by tracking the degeneration of neural pathways and relating it to impaired fMRI activations and behavior. Compared to controls, an abnormal pattern of brain activity was observed in the patient during word reading, with a lack of activation of the left visual word form area (VWFA) by left hemifield words. Statistical analyses of diffusion images revealed a damaged fiber tract linking the left ventral occipito-temporal region to its right homolog across the lesioned area of corpus callosum and stopping close to the areas found active in fMRI. The behavioral disconnection syndrome could, thus, be related functionally to abnormal fMRI activations and anatomically to the absence of a connection between those activations. The present approach, based on the "negative tracking" of degenerated bundles, provides new perspectives on the understanding of human brain connections and disconnections.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/08989290260045864

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dejerine J., 1892, Mémoires de la Sociétéde Biologie, 4, 61

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 144

Metadata

Authors
Molko, N., Cohen, L., Mangin, J. F., Chochon, F., Lehéricy, S., Bihan, D. L., & Dehaene, S.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • UNAF, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, Commisariat à l'Energie Atanique
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
  • Human Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2002-05
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
629-636
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2098520947
Cited by
144
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
disconnection syndrome, alexia, corpus callosum lesions, posterior corpus callosum, visual word form area, interhemispheric connectivity, word reading, fMRI activation, diffusion tensor imaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Dyslexia, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Reading, Verbal Behavior, Anisotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review