Cited by 236Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismCognitive Functions and Memory

Who Comes First? The Role of the Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex in Cognitive Control

Open access
Brass, Marcel, Ullsperger, Markus, Knoesche, Thomas R., Cramon, D. Yves von, Phillips, Natalie A.·2005·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Cognitive control processes enable us to adjust our behavior to changing environmental demands. Although neuropsychological studies suggest that the critical cortical region for cognitive control is the prefrontal cortex, neuro-imaging studies have emphasized the interplay of prefrontal and parietal cortices. This raises the fundamental question about the different contributions of prefrontal and parietal areas in cognitive control. It was assumed that the prefrontal cortex biases processing in posterior brain regions. This assumption leads to the hypothesis that neural activity in the prefrontal cortex should precede parietal activity in cognitive control. The present study tested this assumption by combining results from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) providing high spatial resolution and event-related potentials (ERPs) to gain high temporal resolution. We collected ERP data using a modified task-switching paradigm. In this paradigm, a situation where the same task was indicated by two different cues was compared with a situation where two cues indicated different tasks. Only the latter condition required updating of the task set. Task-set updating was associated with a midline negative ERP deflection peaking around 470 msec. We placed dipoles in regions activated in a previous fMRI study that used the same paradigm (left inferior frontal junction, right inferior frontal gyrus, right parietal cortex) and fitted their directions and magnitudes to the ERP effect. The frontal dipoles contributed to the ERP effect earlier than the parietal dipole, providing support for the view that the prefrontal cortex is involved in updating of general task representations and biases relevant stimulus-response associations in the parietal cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/0898929054985400

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frontal dipoles contributed prior to parietal dipoles in a task involving updating working memory to bias processing of stimulus-response mappings mediated by the parietal cortex.

    “Frontal dipoles contributed prior to parietal dipoles in a task involving updating working memory to bias processing of stimulus-response mappings mediated by the parietal cortex [78].”

    From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Abstract and Dipole Modeling section report that frontal dipoles contributed earlier than the parietal dipole during task-set updating, and interpret this as frontal activity biasing stimulus–response associations in parietal cortex. The paper describes updating task representations, but does not identify the task as updating working memory; that added specificity is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. In A. Zani & A. M. Proverbio (Eds.), The cognitive electrophysiology of mind and brain (pp. 143-168). San Diego: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brass, M., Ullsperger, M., Knoesche, T. R., Cramon, D. Y. V., & Phillips, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
  • Concordia University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1367-1375
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2118483696
Cited by
236
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cognitive control, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, task switching, stimulus-response associations
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Cues, Electroencephalography, Electrooculography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review