The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading
Abstract
ERPs were recorded from 24 undergraduates as they read sentences known to differ in syntactic complexity and working memory requirements, namely Object and Subject Relative sentences. Both the single-word and multiword analyses revealed significant differences due to sentence type, while multiword ERPs also showed that sentence type effects differed for Good and Poor comprehenders. At the single-word level, ERPs to both verbs in Object Relative sentences showed a left anterior negativity between 300 and 500 msec postword-onset relative to those to Subject Relative verbs. At the multiword level, a slow frontal positivity characterized Subject Relative sentences, but was absent for Object Relatives. This slow positivity appears to index ease of processing or integration. and was more robust in Good than in Poor comprehenders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362342a0 · Cited by 2,230
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960
D1 Dopamine Receptors in Prefrontal Cortex: Involvement in Working Memory
Sawaguchi, T., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1825731 · Cited by 1,364
Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension
St. John, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (1990) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90008-n · Cited by 322
Cited by
Gevins, A. (1997) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/7.4.374 · Cited by 1,623
The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909600386084 · Cited by 993
Conversation Electrified: ERP Correlates of Speech Act Recognition in Underspecified Utterances
Gisladottir, R. S., Chwilla, D. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120068 · Cited by 108
Unification of sentence processing via ear and eye: An fMRI study
Braze, D., Mencl, W. E., Tabor, W., Pugh, K. R., Todd Constable, R., Fulbright, R. K., Magnuson, J. S., Van Dyke, J. A., & Shankweiler, D. P. (2011) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.005 · Cited by 69
Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Bartlett-Hsu, L. (2015) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.15mor · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- King, J. W., & Kutas, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-395
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2138006508
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
