The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers
Abstract
Changes in several postnatal maturational processes during neural development have been implicated as potential mechanisms underlying critical period phenomena. Lenneberg hypothesized that maturational processes similar to those that govern sensory and motor development may also constrain capabilities for normal language acquisition. Our goal, using a bilingual model, was to investigate the hypothesis that maturational constraints may have different effects upon the development of the functional specializations of distinct sub within language. Subjects were 61 adult Chinese/English bilinguals who were exposed to English at different points in development: 1–3, 4–6, 7–10, 11–13, and after 16 years of age. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and behavioral responses were obtained as subjects read sentences that included semantic anomalies, three types of syntactic violations (phrase structure, specificity constraint, and subjacency constraint), and their controls. The accuracy in judging the grammaticality for the different types of syntactic rules and their associated ERPs was affected by delays in second language exposure as short as 1–3 years. By comparison the N400 response and the judgment accuracies in detecting semantic anomalies were altered only in subjects who were exposed to English after 11–13 and 16 years of age, respectively. Further, the type of changes occurring in ERPs with delays in exposure were qualitatively different for semantic and syntactic processing. All groups displayed a significant N400 effect in response to semantic anomalies, however, the peak latencies of the N400 elicited in bilinguals who were exposed to English between 11–13 and >16 years occurred later, suggesting a slight slowing in processing. For syntactic processing. the ERP differences associated with delays in exposure to English were observed in the morphology and distribution of components. Our findings are consistent with the view that maturational changes significantly constrain the development of the neural systems that are relevant for language and, further, that subsystems specialized for processing different aspects of language display different sensitive periods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
The Biological Foundations of Language
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 · Cited by 6,605
Concurrent overproduction of synapses in diverse regions of the primate cerebral cortex
Rakic, P., Bourgeois, J.-P., Eckenhoff, M. F., Zecevic, N., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3952506 · Cited by 1,133
Newport, E. L. (1988) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/0388-0001(88)90010-1 · Cited by 247
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1126/science.180.4088.876 · DOI
- 10.1016/0926-6410(93)90026-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0093-934X(78)90002-0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.3952507 · DOI
- Jasper H. H., 1958, I O, 370
- 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90054-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.196 · DOI · Paper page
- Knudsen E. I., 1990, TheJournal of Neuroscience, 10, 222
- 10.1126/science.7350657 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90131-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90015-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0142716400005762 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90018-F · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03202635 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cercor/2.3.244 · DOI · Paper page
- Osterhout L., 1996, Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 3
- Pomeroy S. L., 1990, TheJournal of Neuroscience, 10, 1952
- 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.3.345 · DOI · Paper page
- Seliger H. W., 1975, Language Sciences, 36, 20
- 10.3758/BF03197127 · DOI · Paper page
- Welch B. L., 1947, Biometrika, 34, 28
- 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.978 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior
Knudsen, E. I. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929042304796 · Cited by 1,842
The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision
Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728902003012 · Cited by 1,730
A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers
Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007 · Cited by 625
Language selection in bilingual speech: evidence for inhibitory processes
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra, M., & Guo, T. (2008) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.001 · Cited by 535
Neville, H. J., Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Rauschecker, J., Karni, A., Lalwani, A., Braun, A., Clark, V., Jezzard, P., & Turner, R. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.922 · Cited by 514
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-256
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2032962364
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.