Cited by 111Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Word, Pseudoword, and Nonword Processing: A Multitask Comparison Using Event-Related Brain Potentials

Ziegler, Johannes C., Besson, Mireille, Jacobs, Arthur M., Nazir, Tatjana A., Carr, Thomas H.·1997·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to words, pseudowords, and nonwords were recorded in three different tasks. A letter search task was used in Experiment 1. Performance was affected by whether the target letter occurred in a word, a pseudoword, or a random nonword. ERP results corroborated the behavioral results, showing small but reliable ERP differences between the three stimulus types. Words and pseudowords differed from nonwords at posterior sites, whereas words differed from pseudowords and nonwords at anterior sites. Since deciding whether the target letter was present or absent co-occurred with stimulus processing in Experiment 1, a delayed letter search task was used in Experiment 2. ERPs to words and pseudowords were similar and differed from ERPs to nonwords, suggesting a primary role of orthographic and phonological processing in the delayed letter search task. To increase semantic processing, a categorization task was used in Experiment 3. Early differences between ERPs to words and pseudowords at left posterior and anterior locations suggested a rapid activation of lexico-semantic information. These findings suggest that the use of ERPs in a multiple task design makes it possible to track the time course and the activation of multiple sources of linguistic information when processing words, pseudowords, and nonwords. The task-dependent nature of the effects suggests that the language system can use multiple sources of linguistic information in flexible and adaptive ways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.758

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The VWFA demonstrates a sublexical sensitivity to the orthographic regularities by which letters form words.

    “However, it demonstrates a sublexical sensitivity to the orthographic regularities by which letters form words.”
  • Similar phenomena have been demonstrated within the first 200 ms of stimulus processing within ERP and MEG responses associated with the left ventrotemporal region.

    “Similar phenomena have been demonstrated within the first 200 ms of stimulus processing within ERP and MEG responses associated with the left ventrotemporal region [13,26,27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziegler, J. C., Besson, M., Jacobs, A. M., Nazir, T. A., & Carr, T. H.
Affiliations
  • Center for Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Marseille, France
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
1997-11-01
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
758-775
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2161583812
Cited by
111
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
word processing, nonword processing, orthographic processing, phonological processing, letter search, semantic classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review