Cited by 91Face Recognition and PerceptionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Fear Recognition Ability Predicts Differences in Social Cognitive and Neural Functioning in Men

Open access
Corden, Ben, Critchley, Hugo D., Skuse, David, Dolan, Raymond J.·2006·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

By testing the facial fear-recognition ability of 341 men in the general population, we show that 8.8% have deficits akin to those seen with acquired amygdala damage. Using psychological tests and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) we tested the hypothesis that poor fear recognition would predict deficits in other domains of social cognition and, in response to socially relevant stimuli, abnormal activation in brain regions that putatively reflect engagement of the “social brain.” On tests of “theory of mind” ability, 25 “low fear scorers” (LFS) performed significantly worse than 25 age- and IQ-matched “normal (good) fear scorers” (NFS). In fMRI, we compared evoked activity during a gender judgement task to neutral faces portraying different head and eye gaze orientations in 12 NFS and 12 LFS subjects. Despite identical between-group accuracy in gender discrimination, LFS demonstrated significantly reduced activation in amygdala, fusiform gyrus, and anterior superior temporal cortices when viewing faces with direct versus averted gaze. In a functional connectivity analysis, NFS show enhanced connectivity between the amygdala and anterior temporal cortex in the context of direct gaze; this enhanced coupling is absent in LFS. We suggest that important individual differences in social cognitive skills are expressed within the healthy male population, which appear to have a basis in a compromised neural system that underpins social information processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.889

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fear contagion in humans correlates positively with several other measures of empathy, including those with no obvious murine equivalent.

    “Fear contagion in humans correlates positively with several other measures of empathy, including those with no obvious murine equivalent74.”

    From Oxytocin enhances observational fear in mice (2017) · cites this paper as [74]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ekman P Friesen W Pictures offacial affect 1976 Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologists Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corden, B., Critchley, H. D., Skuse, D., & Dolan, R. J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
889-897
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W1972495021
Cited by
91
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (078865)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
social cognition, theory of mind, amygdala, social brain, gaze direction, gender discrimination, fusiform gyrus, individual differences, men
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Fear, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Predictive Value of Tests, Temporal Lobe, Expressed Emotion, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review