The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of Hand Motor Circuits to Counting
Open accessAbstract
The finding that number processing activates a cortical network partly overlapping that recruited for hand movements has renewed interest in the relationship between number and finger representations. Further evidence about a possible link between fingers and numbers comes from developmental studies showing that finger movements play a crucial role in learning counting. However, increased activity in hand motor circuits during counting may unveil unspecific processes, such as shifting attention, reciting number names, or matching items with a number name. To address this issue, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure changes in corticospinal (CS) excitability during a counting task performed silently and using either numbers or letters of the alphabet to enumerate items. We found an increased CS excitability of hand muscles during the counting task, irrespective of the use of numbers or letters, whereas it was unchanged in arm and foot muscles. Control tasks allowed us to rule out a possible influence of attention allocation or covert speech on CS excitability increase of hand muscles during counting. The present results support a specific involvement of hand motor circuits in counting because no CS changes were found in arm and foot muscles during the same task. However, the contribution of hand motor areas is not exclusively related to number processing because an increase in CS excitability was also found when letters were used to enumerate items. This finding suggests that hand motor circuits are involved whenever items have to be put in correspondence with the elements of any ordered series.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study
Fadiga, L., Buccino, G., Craighero, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Pavesi, G. (1998) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00089-x · Cited by 474
Saccadic target selection deficits after lateral intraparietal area inactivation in monkeys
Wardak, C., Olivier, E., & Duhamel, J.-R. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-22-09877.2002 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Cited by
Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain
Anderson, M. L. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000853 · Cited by 1,212
Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations
FISCHER, M. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004 · Cited by 264
Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260 · Cited by 262
Origins of Mathematical Intuitions: The Case of Arithmetic
Dehaene, S. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04469.x · Cited by 262
Eroding the Boundaries of Cognition: Implications of Embodiment1
Anderson, M. L., Richardson, M. J., & Chemero, A. (2012) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01211.x · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2007-04-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-576
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2050026344
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of Hand Motor Circuits to Counting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.563
- The paper
- Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E. (2007). Contribution of Hand Motor Circuits to Counting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.563
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.