Cited by 148Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Evidence for Early Morphological Decomposition in Visual Word Recognition

Solomyak, Olla, Marantz, Alec·2010·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

We employ a single-trial correlational MEG analysis technique to investigate early processing in the visual recognition of morphologically complex words. Three classes of affixed words were presented in a lexical decision task: free stems (e.g., taxable), bound roots (e.g., tolerable), and unique root words (e.g., vulnerable, the root of which does not appear elsewhere). Analysis was focused on brain responses within 100–200 msec poststimulus onset in the previously identified letter string and visual word-form areas. MEG data were analyzed using cortically constrained minimum-norm estimation. Correlations were computed between activity at functionally defined ROIs and continuous measures of the words' morphological properties. ROIs were identified across subjects on a reference brain and then morphed back onto each individual subject's brain (n = 9). We find evidence of decomposition for both free stems and bound roots at the M170 stage in processing. The M170 response is shown to be sensitive to morphological properties such as affix frequency and the conditional probability of encountering each word given its stem. These morphological properties are contrasted with orthographic form features (letter string frequency, transition probability from one string to the next), which exert effects on earlier stages in processing (∼130 msec). We find that effects of decomposition at the M170 can, in fact, be attributed to morphological properties of complex words, rather than to purely orthographic and form-related properties. Our data support a model of word recognition in which decomposition is attempted, and possibly utilized, for complex words containing bound roots as well as free word-stems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2009.21296

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sublexical morpho-orthographic processing is performed by neural structures in fusiform gyrus.

    “With respect to the role of fusiform gyrus in fine-grained orthographic processing as defined in our account, it is important to note that there is evidence suggesting that sublexical morpho-orthographic processing is performed by neural structures in this region (Bick et al., 2011; Solomyak and Marantz, 2009).”

    From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Solomyak and Marantz, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
2042-2057
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2118438280
Cited by
148
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual word recognition, morphological decomposition, morphologically complex words, M170, orthographic processing, lexical decision
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reading, Time Factors, Word Association Tests, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review