Cited by 121Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural Networks and ApplicationsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Dynamics and Computation of Continuous Attractors

Wu, Si, Hamaguchi, Kosuke, Amari, Shun-ichi·2008·Neural Computation

Abstract

Continuous attractor is a promising model for describing the encoding of continuous stimuli in neural systems. In a continuous attractor, the stationary states of the neural system form a continuous parameter space, on which the system is neutrally stable. This property enables the neutral system to track time-varying stimuli smoothly, but it also degrades the accuracy of information retrieval, since these stationary states are easily disturbed by external noise. In this work, based on a simple model, we systematically investigate the dynamics and the computational properties of continuous attractors. In order to analyze the dynamics of a large-size network, which is otherwise extremely complicated, we develop a strategy to reduce its dimensionality by utilizing the fact that a continuous attractor can eliminate the noise components perpendicular to the attractor space very quickly. We therefore project the network dynamics onto the tangent of the attractor space and simplify it successfully as a one-dimensional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Based on this simplified model, we investigate (1) the decoding error of a continuous attractor under the driving of external noisy inputs, (2) the tracking speed of a continuous attractor when external stimulus experiences abrupt changes, (3) the neural correlation structure associated with the specific dynamics of a continuous attractor, and (4) the consequence of asymmetric neural correlation on statistical population decoding. The poten…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco.2008.10-06-378

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, S., Hamaguchi, K., & Amari, S.-I.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Amari Research Unit, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Venue
Neural Computation
Published
2008-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
994-1025
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W2074540734
Cited by
121
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E017436/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
continuous attractor networks, neural population dynamics, marginal stability, dimensionality reduction, tangent space projection, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, decoding errors, tracking speed, population decoding, noise robustness
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Humans, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks, Computer, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review