Dynamics and Computation of Continuous Attractors
Abstract
Continuous attractor is a promising model for describing the encoding of continuous stimuli in neural systems. In a continuous attractor, the stationary states of the neural system form a continuous parameter space, on which the system is neutrally stable. This property enables the neutral system to track time-varying stimuli smoothly, but it also degrades the accuracy of information retrieval, since these stationary states are easily disturbed by external noise. In this work, based on a simple model, we systematically investigate the dynamics and the computational properties of continuous attractors. In order to analyze the dynamics of a large-size network, which is otherwise extremely complicated, we develop a strategy to reduce its dimensionality by utilizing the fact that a continuous attractor can eliminate the noise components perpendicular to the attractor space very quickly. We therefore project the network dynamics onto the tangent of the attractor space and simplify it successfully as a one-dimensional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Based on this simplified model, we investigate (1) the decoding error of a continuous attractor under the driving of external noisy inputs, (2) the tracking speed of a continuous attractor when external stimulus experiences abrupt changes, (3) the neural correlation structure associated with the specific dynamics of a continuous attractor, and (4) the consequence of asymmetric neural correlation on statistical population decoding. The poten…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The connectivity profile between band cells is reminiscent of the center-surround connection pattern in a 1D CANN.
“reminiscent of the center-surround connection pattern in a 1D CANN [30].”
From Unfolding the Black Box of Recurrent Neural Networks for Path Integration (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918 · see citing works
Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Funahashi, S., Bruce, C. J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1989) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1989.61.2.331 · Cited by 2,685 · see citing works
Dynamics of the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space
Wilson, M. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8351520 · Cited by 2,350 · see citing works
Neural correlations, population coding and computation
Averbeck, B. B., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1888 · Cited by 1,743 · see citing works
How the brain keeps the eyes still
Seung, H. S. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.23.13339 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Stability of the memory of eye position in a recurrent network of conductance-based model neurons
Seung, H. S., Lee, D. D., Reis, B. Y., & Tank, D. W. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81155-1 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Attractor Dynamics of Spatially Correlated Neural Activity in the Limbic System
Knierim, J. J., & Zhang, K. (2012) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150351 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
The Neuroanatomical Ultrastructure and Function of a Biological Ring Attractor
Turner-Evans, D. B., Jensen, K. T., Ali, S., Paterson, T., Sheridan, A., Ray, R. P., Wolff, T., Lauritzen, J. S., Rubin, G. M., Bock, D. D., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.006 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
The neuroanatomical ultrastructure and function of a biological ring attractor
Turner-Evans, D. B., Jensen, K. T., Ali, S., Paterson, T., Sheridan, A., Ray, R. P., Wolff, T., Lauritzen, S., Rubin, G. M., Bock, D., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/847152 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Zhang, W.-H., Wang, H., Chen, A., Gu, Y., Lee, T. S., Wong, K. M., & Wu, S. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.43753 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationUnfolding the Black Box of Recurrent Neural Networks for Path Integration
Chu, T., Wu, Y., Burgess, N., Ji, Z., & Wu, S. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-3412 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wu, S., Hamaguchi, K., & Amari, S.-I.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- RIKEN (JP)
- Amari Research Unit, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 994-1025
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2074540734
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Royal Society
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E017436/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- continuous attractor networks, neural population dynamics, marginal stability, dimensionality reduction, tangent space projection, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, decoding errors, tracking speed, population decoding, noise robustness
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Humans, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks, Computer, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review