Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contribution of genetics to the study of animal personalities: a review of case studies

Open access
Drent, Pieter J., van Noordwijk, Arie J., van Oers, Kees, de Jong, Gerdien, Kempenaers, B.·2005·Behaviour

Abstract

The need for evolutionary studies on quantitative traits that integrate genetics is increasing.Studies on consistent individual differences in behavioural traits provide a good opportunity to do controlled experiments on the genetic mechanisms underlying the variation and covariation in complex behavioural traits.In this review we will highlight the contribution of genetic studies in animal personality research.We will start with reviewing the evidence that shows how much variation in animal personality traits is genetic, and connect this to knowledge from human personality studies.We will continue by considering the nature of that variation, its generation and maintenance.Finally we will point to further possibilities for studying the genetics of animal personalities.We will underline the importance of integrating both proximate and ultimate approaches when studying the evolution of animal personalities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156853905774539364

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Drent, P. J., van Noordwijk, A. J., van Oers, K., de Jong, G., & Kempenaers, B.
Venue
Behaviour
Published
2005
Volume
142
Issue
9-10
Pages
1185-1206
ISSN
  • 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-539X
OpenAlex
W2170844886
Cited by
431
References
7
FWCI
11.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.