Cited by 265Stress Responses and CortisolAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The stress response systems: Universality and adaptive individual differences☆

ELLIS, B, JACKSON, J, BOYCE, W·2006·Developmental Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.004

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Life-history traits and strategies tend not to be genetically fixed; they evolve to show developmental plasticity.

    “LH traits and strategies tend not to be genetically fixed, but rather evolve to show developmental plasticity”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Ellis et al., 2006

  • The stress response system is a general interface with the environment, mediating adjustment to both positive and negative events.

    “the SRS is a general interface with the environment, mediating the organism’s adjustment to both positive and negative events”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Ellis et al., 2006

  • The stress response system comprises three anatomically distinct neuroendocrine circuits-sympathetic, parasympathetic, and HPA-whose activity is integrated and cross-regulated as a single functional system.

    “The SRS comprises three anatomically distinct neuroendocrine circuits: the sympathetic (SNS) and parasympathetic (PNS) branches of the autonomic nervous system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA). The activity of these circuits is integrated and cross-regulated, so that they can be considered as components of a single functional system”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Ellis et al., 2006

  • Sensitive children and adults are reflective, self- and other-conscious, engaged with the environment, and high in inhibitory control, executive function, and delay of gratification.

    “Sensitive children and adults are reflective, self- and other-conscious, and engaged with the environment; they are also high in inhibitory control, executive function, and delay of gratification.”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Ellis et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ELLIS, B., JACKSON, J., & BOYCE, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
ELLIS, B
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
175-212
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092151632
Cited by
265
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 27
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
stress system, individual differences, phenotypic plasticity, genetic polymorphism, natural selection, developmental experiences, heritability, ecological specialization, neuroendocrine response, stress reactivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review