The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vitro and in vivo degradation of non-woven materials made of poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers prepared by electrospinning under different conditions
Abstract
The aim of this study was to prepare non-woven materials from a biodegradable polymer, poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) by electrospinning. PCL was synthesized by ring-opening polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone in bulk using stannous octoate as the catalyst under nitrogen atmosphere. PCL was then processed into non-woven matrices composed of nanofibers by electrospinning of the polymer from its solution using a high voltage power supply. The effects of PCL concentration, composition of the solvent (a mixture of chloroform and DMF with different DMF content), applied voltage and tip-collector distance on fiber diameter and morphology were investigated. The diameter of fibers increased with the increase in the polymer concentration and decrease in the DMF content significantly. Applied voltage and tip-collector distance were found critical to control 'bead' formation. Elongation-at-break, ultimate strength and Young's modulus were obtained from the mechanical tests, which were all increased by increasing fiber diameter. The fiber diameter significantly influenced both in vitro degradation (performed in Ringer solution) and in vivo biodegradation (conducted in rats) rates. In vivo degradation was found to be faster than in vitro. Electrospun membranes were more hydrophobic than PCL solvent-casted ones; therefore, their degradation was a much slower process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Further investigations on the hydrolytic degradation of poly (DL-lactide)
Li, S., & McCarthy, S. (1999) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00226-3 · Cited by 301
Synthesis, characterization and degradation of ABA block copolymer of l-lactide and ε-caprolactone
Qian, H., Bei, J., & Wang, S. (2000) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/s0141-3910(00)00031-8 · Cited by 152
Cited by
Progess in superhydrophobic surface development
Roach, P., Shirtcliffe, N. J., & Newton, M. I. (2008) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b712575p · Cited by 1,615
Degradation mechanisms of polycaprolactone in the context of chemistry, geometry and environment
Bartnikowski, M., Dargaville, T. R., Ivanovski, S., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.05.004 · Cited by 769
Hydrolytic Degradation and Erosion of Polyester Biomaterials
Woodard, L. N., & Grunlan, M. A. (2018) · ACS Macro Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00424 · Cited by 477
Pektok, E., Nottelet, B., Tille, J.-C., Gurny, R., Kalangos, A., Moeller, M., & Walpoth, B. H. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.795732 · Cited by 358
Li, X., Xie, J., Yuan, X., & Xia, Y. (2008) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la802984a · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Bölgen, N., Menceloğlu, Y. Z., Acatay, K., Vargel, İ., & Pişkin, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1537-1555
- ISSN
- 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5624
- OpenAlex
- W2155805644
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro and in vivo degradation of non-woven materials made of poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers prepared by electrospinning under different conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156856205774576655
- The paper
- Bölgen, N., Menceloğlu, Y. Z., Acatay, K., Vargel, İ., & Pişkin, E. (2005). In vitro and in vivo degradation of non-woven materials made of poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers prepared by electrospinning under different conditions. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856205774576655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.