Cited by 25Force Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyPolymer Surface Interaction Studies

Characterization of surface microphase structures of poly(urethane urea) biomaterials by nanoscale indentation with AFM

Xu, Li-Chong, Soman, Pranav, Runt, James, Siedlecki, Christopher A.·2007·Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy utilizing both tapping mode and force mode imaging is used to visualize the separated microphases in poly(urethane urea) films under ambient and aqueous conditions. The topography of the PUU surface changed upon hydration with the formation of nanometer-sized features on the surface. The surface becomes enriched in hard domains with hydration time and this enrichment is irreversible after dehydration. Force mode measurements were used to quantify mechanical properties as both indentation and modulus measurements. Analysis of the modulus during indentation reveals the three-dimensional nature of the structures, with the surface being covered by a 2-20-nm-thick soft segment overlayer under ambient conditions, while hydration leads to the loss of this overlayer. The force measurements also reveal the presence of regions having modulus values between those of the hard and soft phases and located spatially near the interface between the hard and soft domains. However, such regions with intermediate modulus were only rarely seen following hydration. Calculation of the Young's modulus from the compression data shows that hydration increases the modulus of the PUU surface by both enrichment of the amount of hard domain present and increasing the modulus of the individual hard and soft phases themselves. Direct visualization of the distribution of these different domains on the surface by nanoscale measurements provides an important path to characterizing the relationships between the surface properties of these materials and subsequent performance in biomedical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156856207780425013

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, L.-C., Soman, P., Runt, J., & Siedlecki, C. A.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Published
2007-01
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
353-368
ISSN
  • 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5624
OpenAlex
W2072633878
Cited by
25
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
Keywords
poly(urethane-urea), hydration, nanoscale indentation, surface modulus, Young's modulus, surface topography, biomaterials
MeSH terms
Polyurethanes, Surface Properties, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Nanotechnology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review