Cited by 252biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

A review of the biostability and carcinogenicity of polyurethanes in medicine and the new generation of 'biostable' polyurethanes

Pinchuk, Leonard·1995·Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

Abstract

Polyurethanes are very versatile materials which have been used in the body for over 20 years. In fact, there are probably more scientific papers describing these materials and modifications of these materials for medical use than any other material to date. Unfortunately, some formulations of these polymers are subject to biodegradation and have limited their application in the body. Extensive investigation of the biodegradation mechanisms of these polymers by many researchers in the field has led to the development of a new generation of what are now called 'biostable' polyurethanes. This article reviews the history of polyurethane in medicine, polyurethane nomenclature, the biodegradation of these materials, the proposed mechanisms of its degradation as well as the carcinogenicity associated with these materials. Included in the discussion are the polyurethanes used as pacemaker lead insulators as well as those used to coat breast implants. The article concludes with a review of the new generation of 'biostable' polyurethanes and their proposed formulations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156856294x00347

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinchuk, L.
Affiliations
a Corvita Corporation, 8210 NW 27th Street, Miami, FL 33122, USA
Corresponding author
Pinchuk, Leonard
Venue
Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Published
1995-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
225-267
ISSN
  • 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5624
OpenAlex
W2032236882
Cited by
252
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
polyurethane, biostability, biodegradation, carcinogenicity, degradation mechanism
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Biodegradation, Environmental, Cations, Female, Foreign-Body Reaction, Humans, Hydrolysis, Male, Molecular Weight, Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Experimental, Oxidation-Reduction, Polyurethanes, Species Specificity, Stress, Mechanical, Carcinogenicity Tests, Molecular Structure, Prostheses and Implants, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review