Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dose-Response Relationship to Inhaled Endotoxin in Normal Subjects

MICHEL, OLIVIER, NAGY, ANNE-MARIE, SCHROEVEN, MARC, DUCHATEAU, JEAN, NÈVE, JEAN, FONDU, PIERRE, SERGYSELS, ROGER·1997·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Exposure to endotoxin and to its purified derivative lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is related to several occupational pulmonary diseases and to severe domestic asthma. An inhalation of a given dose of pure LPS produces both a systemic and a bronchial inflammatory response. Information on the dose-response relationship to inhaled LPS in normal subjects is a prerequisite to define the safety threshold of exposure. In the present study, the clinical and inflammatory responses to rising doses of inhaled LPS was evaluated. Nine normal volunteers were challenged weekly by inhalation with saline, 0.5, 5, and 50 microg LPS (Escherichia coli). The response determinators are the clinical symptoms, fever, FEV1, blood polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) with their level of activation (measured by luminol enhanced-chemiluminescence), and both the blood and the urine concentrations of the C-reactive protein (CRP). To assess the bronchial inflammatory response, an induced sputum was obtained 6 h after each dose of LPS, and the total and differential cell counts as well as the MPO, ECP, and TNF-alpha concentrations were measured. Compared with the saline, an inhalation of 0.5 microg LPS induces a significant decrease in the PMN luminol-enhanced chemiluminescence (p < 0.01), which could reflect a process of margination and/or extravascular sequestration of activated PMN. Inhalation of 5 microg LPS is associated with a significant rise in blood CRP (p < 0.01) and PMNs (p < 0.001) and in sputum PMNs (p < 0.05), monocytes (p < 0.05), and MPO (p < 0.05). Inhalation of 50 microg LPS was characterized by a significant increase in temperature (p < 0.01), blood PMNs (p < 0.001), blood and urine CRP (p < 0.01 and < 0.01), and sputum PMNs (p < 0.001), monocytes (p < 0.05), lymphocytes (p < 0.05), MPO (p < 0.01), TNF-alpha (p < 0.01), and ECP (p < 0.01) while five subjects develop symptoms. In normal subjects, the response to inhaled LPS is dose-related, the most sensitive markers of LPS-induced inflammation being the blood PMNs count with their level of activation, the blood CRP concentration, and the sputum PMNs count. The no-response threshold to an acute inhalation of LPS is less than 0.5 microg.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.156.4.97-02002

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
MICHEL, O., NAGY, A.-M., SCHROEVEN, M., DUCHATEAU, J., NÈVE, J., FONDU, P., & SERGYSELS, R.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1997-10-01
Volume
156
Issue
4
Pages
1157-1164
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2160418158
Cited by
284
References
35
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose-Response Relationship to Inhaled Endotoxin in Normal Subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.156.4.97-02002
The paper
MICHEL, O., NAGY, A.-M., SCHROEVEN, M., DUCHATEAU, J., NÈVE, J., FONDU, P., & SERGYSELS, R. (1997). Dose-Response Relationship to Inhaled Endotoxin in Normal Subjects. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.4.97-02002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.