Cited by 233Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchTemporomandibular Joint DisordersOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Randomized controlled study of an oral jaw-positioning appliance for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with malocclusion

Villa, Maria P., Bernkopf, Edoardo, Pagani, Jacopo, Broia, Vanna, Montesano, Marilisa, Ronchetti, Roberto·2002·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical usefulness and tolerability of an oral jaw-positioning appliance in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children, we studied 32 patients (mean age, 7.1 +/- 2.6 yr; 20 males) with symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea, malocclusion, and a baseline apnea index > 1 event/h. A group of 19 subjects was randomly assigned to a 6-mo trial of an oral appliance; the remainder acted as control subjects. At baseline and after the trial all patients underwent physical examination, a standard polysomnography, and orthodontic assessment. A modified version of the Brouillette questionnaire related to obstructive sleep apnea symptoms was administered to parents before and after the trial and a clinical score was calculated. Of the 32 subjects enrolled, 4 treated subjects and 5 control subjects were lost to follow-up. Polysomnography after the trial showed that treated subjects all had significantly lower apnea index (p < 0.001) and hypopnea index values (p < 0.001) than before the trial, whereas in untreated control subjects these values remained almost unchanged. Clinical assessment before and after treatment showed that in 7 of the 14 subjects (50%) the oral appliance had reduced (a fall of at least 2 points in the respiratory score) and in 7 had resolved the main respiratory symptoms, whereas untreated patients continued to have symptoms. In conclusion, treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with an oral appliance in children with malocclusion is effective and well tolerated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.165.1.2011031

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villa, M. P., Bernkopf, E., Pagani, J., Broia, V., Montesano, M., & Ronchetti, R.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
165
Issue
1
Pages
123-127
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2133591042
Cited by
233
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, children, malocclusion, oral appliances, mandibular advancement device, apnea index, hypopnea, polysomnography, orthodontic appliances, treatment tolerability
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Malocclusion, Orthodontic Appliances, Removable, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Occlusal Splints, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review