Cited by 62Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Mandibular advancement appliances for the treatment of paediatric obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review

Nazarali, Natasha, Altalibi, Mostafa, Nazarali, Samir, Major, Michael P., Flores-Mir, Carlos, Major, Paul W.·2015·The European Journal of Orthodontics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of mandibular advancement appliances (MAAs) for treatment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Several electronic databases (The Cochrane Database, EMBASE, Healthstar, MEDLINE, PubMed) were systematically searched, as well as a limited grey literature (Google Scholar) and manual searches. A health sciences librarian helped with the selection of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), key words, and combinations of key words with truncations to account for any differences in controlled terminology in the different databases. Only studies that evaluated the effects of MAAs in children with OSA were pursued. RESULTS: Only 4 articles satisfied all inclusion criteria. Selected studies were retrospective except one study that was a quasi-randomized clinical trial. High risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment) was judged in all included studies. Based on the limited available evidence use of MAAs in a POSA population may result in improvements in Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) scores. However complete normalization of AHI scores was not demonstrated. Heterogeneity in study designs and collected information precluded meta-analysis. LIMITATIONS: There are significant weaknesses in the existing evidence due primarily to absence of control groups, small sample sizes, lack of randomization and short-term results. Determination of AHI scores with MAAs still in the mouth should be avoided. CONCLUSIONS: The current limited evidence may be suggestive that MAAs result in short-term improvements in AHI scores, but it is not possible to conclude that MMAs are effective to treat pediatric OSA. Medium- and long-term assessments are still required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ejo/cju101

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nazarali, N., Altalibi, M., Nazarali, S., Major, M. P., Flores-Mir, C., & Major, P. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Venue
The European Journal of Orthodontics
Published
2015-02-12
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
618-626
ISSN
  • 0141-5387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2210
OpenAlex
W2131236218
Cited by
62
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Orthodontics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
mandibular advancement device, pediatric obstructive sleep apnea, apnea-hypopnea index, orthodontic appliances, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Bias, Orthodontic Appliance Design, Mandibular Advancement, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review