Cited by 35Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Mandibular advancement appliances for sleep-disordered breathing in children: A randomized crossover clinical trial

Idris, Ghassan, Galland, Barbara, Robertson, Christopher John, Gray, Andrew, Farella, Mauro·2018·Journal of Dentistry

Abstract

Objective To test the short-term effectiveness of a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) for the management of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children.Methods Eighteen SDB children were enrolled in a crossover randomized clinical trial and assigned to a treatment sequence starting either with an Active or a Sham MAS. Each appliance was worn for three weeks and treatment periods were separated by a two-week washout. Home-based polysomnographic data were collected before and after each treatment period. In addition, blood samples were collected at the end of each treatment period to assess serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and snoring time represented the main outcome variables. Secondary outcomes included IGF-1 levels, and questionnaire scores for quality of life and behavior.Results Compared to the Sham MAS, the wearing of the Active MAS resulted in a significant reduction in overall AHI (-37%; 95% CI = 15-53%; p = 0.002) and supine AHI (-4.1 events per hour; 95% CI = 1.8-6.4; p < 0.001). Mean snoring time per night was shorter with the Active MAS than with the Sham MAS (-46.3 min; 95% CI = 14.5-78.1; p = 0.004). Wearing of the Active MAS improved the ratings of quality of life and behavior (P ≤ 0.028), but there was no evidence that it influenced IGF-1 levels (P = 0.172).Conclusion Wearing an Active MAS overnight, over a short period can be beneficial for SDB children, resulting in a clinically relevant reduction of supine AHI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.006

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Idris, G., Galland, B., Robertson, C. J., Gray, A., & Farella, M.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Farella, Mauro
Venue
Journal of Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
71
Pages
9-17
ISSN
0300-5712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790228210
Cited by
35
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
mandibular advancement device, sleep-disordered breathing, pediatric obstructive sleep apnea, apnea-hypopnea index, snoring, insulin-like growth factor I, quality of life, behavior, home polysomnography
MeSH terms
Cephalometry, Child, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Male, New Zealand, Orthodontic Appliances, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Snoring, Splints, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Mandibular Advancement, Overbite, Anatomic Landmarks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review