Cited by 187Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAsthma and respiratory diseases

Antigenic Analysis of Household Dust Samples

Wood, Robert A., Eggleston, Peyton A., Lind, Peter, Ingemann, Lars, Schwartz, Bente, Graveson, Suzanne, Terry, David, Wheeler, Barbara +1 more·1988·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Household dust samples from the homes of 106 allergy clinic patients in Baltimore were analyzed for specific allergen content. Dust mite antigen content was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) specific for the major allergens of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, D. farinae, and D. microceras. Cat and dog antigen content were determined by ELISA using antisera for Fel d 1 (formerly cat allergen 1) and dog allergens 3 and 13, respectively. Mold content was assessed by culture with microscopic identification. Dust mite antigen was detected in 99% of homes (D. farinae, 95%; D. pteronyssinus, 88%; D. microceras, 31%), with total antigen content ranging from 50 ng/g dust (the lower limit of detection) to 30,170 ng/g (median, 1,123 ng/g). Animal allergens were found in 100% of samples (cat: range, 2 to 130,000 ng Fel d 1/g; median, 90 ng/g; dog: range, 112.5 to 585,000 IU/g; median, 2,719.5 IU/g). Although there were highly significant differences in antigen content (p < 0.001) between homes with and without a particular pet in residence, many homes without pets contained pet allergens at high concentrations. Molds were also detected in 100% of homes (range, 4 to 761 colonies/30 mg dust; median, 72 colonies/30 mg). No correlation was demonstrated between antigen content and skin test results, a history of asthma, symptoms on allergen exposure, or the age of the home (except for molds) for any of the allergens detected. We conclude that dust mite allergens, cat and dog allergens, and molds are virtually ubiquitous in Baltimore homes and that our ability to predict the presence and relative quantities of these allergens on clinical grounds is very limited.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/137.2.358

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, R. A., Eggleston, P. A., Lind, P., Ingemann, L., Schwartz, B., Graveson, S., Terry, D., Wheeler, B., & Adkinson, N. F.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1988-02-01
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
358-363
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080585191
Cited by
187
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Review of Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 21073)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 00035)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
house dust, indoor allergens, house dust mite allergens, Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Fel d 1, dog allergen, house dust mites, molds, pet allergens, allergen exposure, allergy clinic patients, skin test reactivity, asthma
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Allergens, Animals, Antigens, Antigens, Fungal, Asthma, Cats, Child, Child, Preschool, Dogs, Dust, Eczema, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Middle Aged, Mites, Rhinitis, Skin Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review