The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Definition of Asthma for Epidemiology
Abstract
Because there is no "gold standard" for defining asthma for epidemiology, we have defined current asthma as bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) plus recent wheeze (in the 12 months prior to study). To describe the characteristics of groups categorized by these measurements, we studied two samples of children aged 7 to 12 yr: 210 from a population sample and 142 self-identified asthmatics. Bronchial responsiveness to histamine was measured by the rapid method, respiratory symptom history, and asthma medication use by self-administered questionnaire to parents and atopy by skin prick tests to 14 allergens. Children recorded daily Airflometer readings and symptom scores for 2 wk. Children with current asthma had more severe bronchial responsiveness, greater Airflometer variability, more symptoms, more atopy (particularly to house dust mites), and used more asthma medication than children with BHR or recent wheeze alone. Children with BHR, but not with recent wheeze, were intermediate between the current asthma and normal groups in terms of bronchial responsiveness, Airflometer variability, and atopy. Children with recent wheeze and normal responsiveness differed from the normal group only in symptoms and medication use. Our definition of current asthma discriminates a group of children that is clearly different in terms of both clinical features and physiologic measures. As such, it is the most useful definition to date for measuring the prevalence of clinically important asthma in populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness.
Yan, K., Salome, C., & Woolcock, A. J. (1983) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.38.10.760 · Cited by 758
Self-citation
Cited by
Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults
Sterk, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Quanjer, P. H., Cockcroft, D. W., O'Byrne, P. M., Anderson, S. D., Juniper, E. F., & Malo, J.-L. (1993) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09041950.053s1693 · Cited by 1,049
Diagnosing Asthma: Comparisons between Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurements and Conventional Tests
Smith, A. D., Cowan, J. O., Filsell, S., McLachlan, C., Monti-Sheehan, G., Jackson, P., & Taylor, D. R. (2004) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200310-1376oc · Cited by 469
JENKINS, M. A., CLARKE, J. R., CARLIN, J. B., ROBERTSON, C. F., HOPPER, J. L., DALTON, M. F., HOLST, D. P., CHOI, K., & GILES, G. G. (1996) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/25.3.609 · Cited by 446
Obesity is a risk for asthma and wheeze but not airway hyperresponsiveness
Schachter, L. M. (2001) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.56.1.4 · Cited by 431
Defining asthma in epidemiological studies
Pekkanen, J., & Pearce, N. (1999) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d37.x · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Toelle, B. G., Peat, J. K., Salome, C. M., Mellis, C. M., & Woolcock, A. J.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 633-637
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041223278
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Definition of Asthma for Epidemiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/146.3.633
- The paper
- Toelle, B. G., Peat, J. K., Salome, C. M., Mellis, C. M., & Woolcock, A. J. (1992). Toward a Definition of Asthma for Epidemiology. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/146.3.633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.