Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Large Subgroup of Mild-to-Moderate Asthma Is Persistently Noneosinophilic

Open access
McGrath, Kelly Wong, Icitovic, Nikolina, Boushey, Homer A., Lazarus, Stephen C., Sutherland, E. Rand, Chinchilli, Vernon M., Fahy, John V.·2012·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Airway eosinophilia is typical of asthma, and many controller treatments target eosinophilic disease. Asthma is clinically heterogeneous, however, and a subgroup of people with asthma do not have airway eosinophilia. The size of this subgroup is uncertain because prior studies have not examined repeated measures of sputum cytology to determine when people with asthma have intermittent versus persistent sputum eosinophila and when they are persistently noneosinophilic. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of the noneosinophilic asthma phenotype. METHODS: We analyzed sputum cytology data from 995 subjects with asthma enrolled in clinical trials in the Asthma Clinical Research Network where they had undergone sputum induction and measures of sputum cytology, often repeatedly, and assessment of responses to standardized asthma treatments. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In cross-sectional analyses, sputum eosinophilia (≥2% eosinophils) was found in only 36% of subjects with asthma not taking an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and 17% of ICS-treated subjects with asthma; an absence of eosinophilia was noted frequently, even in subjects with asthma whose disease was suboptimally controlled. In repeated measures analyses of people with asthma not taking an ICS, 22% of subjects had sputum eosinophilia on every occasion (persistent eosinophilia); 31% had eosinophilia on at least one occasion (intermittent eosinophilia); and 47% had no eosinophilia on every occasion (persistently noneosinophilic). Two weeks of combined antiinflammatory therapy caused significant improvements in airflow obstruction in eosinophilic asthma, but not in persistently noneosinophilic asthma. In contrast, bronchodilator responses to albuterol were similar in eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of patients with mild-to-moderate asthma have persistently noneosinophilic disease, a disease phenotype that responds poorly to currently available antiinflammatory therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201109-1640oc

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
McGrath, K. W., Icitovic, N., Boushey, H. A., Lazarus, S. C., Sutherland, E. R., Chinchilli, V. M., & Fahy, J. V.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2012-03-15
Volume
185
Issue
6
Pages
612-619
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2108919922
Cited by
478
References
3
FWCI
31.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Large Subgroup of Mild-to-Moderate Asthma Is Persistently Noneosinophilic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201109-1640oc
The paper
McGrath, K. W., Icitovic, N., Boushey, H. A., Lazarus, S. C., Sutherland, E. R., Chinchilli, V. M., & Fahy, J. V. (2012). A Large Subgroup of Mild-to-Moderate Asthma Is Persistently Noneosinophilic. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201109-1640oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.