Cited by 287Respiratory Support and MechanismsNosocomial Infections in ICUNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Conservative versus Liberal Oxygenation Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Patients. A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Panwar, Rakshit, Hardie, Miranda, Bellomo, Rinaldo, Barrot, Loïc, Eastwood, Glenn M., Young, Paul J., Capellier, Gilles, Harrigan, Peter W. J. +1 more·2016·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Rationale: There are no randomized controlled trials comparing different oxygenation targets for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Objectives: To determine whether a conservative oxygenation strategy is a feasible alternative to a liberal oxygenation strategy among ICU patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Methods: At four multidisciplinary ICUs, 103 adult patients deemed likely to require IMV for greater than or equal to 24 hours were randomly allocated to either a conservative oxygenation strategy with target oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) of 88–92% (n = 52) or a liberal oxygenation strategy with target SpO2 of greater than or equal to 96% (n = 51). Measurements and Main Results: The mean area under the curve and 95% confidence interval (CI) for SpO2 (93.4% [92.9–93.9%] vs. 97% [96.5–97.5%]), SaO2 (93.5% [93.1–94%] vs. 96.8% [96.3–97.3%]), PaO2 (70 [68–73] mm Hg vs. 92 [89–96] mm Hg), and FiO2 (0.26 [0.25–0.28] vs. 0.36 [0.34–0.39) in the conservative versus liberal oxygenation arm were significantly different (P < 0.0001 for all). There were no significant between-group differences in any measures of new organ dysfunction, or ICU or 90-day mortality. The percentage time spent with SpO2 less than 88% in conservative versus liberal arm was 1% versus 0.3% (P = 0.03), and percentage time spent with SpO2 greater than 98% in conservative versus liberal arm was 4% versus 22% (P < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio for 90-day mortality in the conservative arm was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.40–1.50; P = 0.44) overall and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.20–1.17; P = 0.10) in the prespecified subgroup of patients with a baseline PaO2/FiO2 less than 300. Conclusions: Our study supports the feasibility of a conservative oxygenation strategy in patients receiving IMV. Larger randomized controlled trials of this intervention appear justified. Clinical trial registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN 12613000505707)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201505-1019oc

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence for the use of conservative oxygen targets and therapy in patients with sepsis is limited, with three randomised trials in the critically ill population.

    “The evidence for the use of conservative oxygen targets (generally defined as PaO2 55–70 mmHg; SpO2 88–92%) and therapy in patients with sepsis is limited, with three randomised trials in the critically ill population [404–406].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panwar, R., Hardie, M., Bellomo, R., Barrot, L., Eastwood, G. M., Young, P. J., Capellier, G., Harrigan, P. W. J., & Bailey, M.
Affiliations
  • John Hunter Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
  • Wellington Hospital (NZ)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Panwar, Rakshit
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
193
Issue
1
Pages
43-51
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1928918188
Cited by
287
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 2
FWCI
22.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Intensive Care Foundation
  • University Hospital Besançon
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
oxygen saturation targets, invasive mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit patients, oxygen therapy, 90-day mortality, organ dysfunction, fraction of inspired oxygen, PaO2, pulse oximetry, ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute kidney injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute heart failure, acute stroke, acute liver failure
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Oximetry, Oxygen, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Pilot Projects, Respiration, Artificial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review