CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 706Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Episodic luteinizing hormone secretion in man. Pulse analysis, clinical interpretation, physiologic mechanisms

Open access
Santen, R. J., Bardin, C. W.·1973·Journal of Clinical Investigation
DOI 10.1172/jci107454PMC PMC302522
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The demonstration that luteinizing hormone (LH) release from the pituitary is episodic rather than constant raises fundamental questions regarding the physiologic control of pulsatile LH secretion and its possible alteration in patients with gonadal disorders. To evaluate this mode of LH secretion, quantitative means of analyzing LH pulse amplitude, frequency, shape, and area were established and utilized to study normal subjects and patients with disorders of gonadotropin secretion. Similar patterns of LH secretion were observed in normal men, in women during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, and in patients with hyper- and hypogonadotropism, hirsuitism, and amenorrhea (mean pulse amplitude 39-179% from nadir to peak, frequency 2.7-3.9 secretory spikes/6 h). These observations suggested that the pattern of LH secretion is similar in both normal individuals and in those with a variety of pathologic conditions. By contrast, the pattern of pulsatile secretion appeared to differ in the following conditions. LH pulses of higher amplitude (333+/-170%) and lower frequency (1.6+/-0.24 SEM/6 h) characterized the secretory patterns of women during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, suggesting that gonadal steroids may modulate LH pulses. LH pulses of low amplitude (26+/-2.1%) and frequency (1.3+/-0.36/6 h) were observed in women with anorexia nervosa. Either integrated LH levels or a mean LH level determined from multiple samples provided a more accurate reflection of gonadotropin secretion than the use of single LH measurements. With multiple sampling over 6 h, it was possible to reduce the 95% confidence limit of LH estimates from +/-50-90 to +/-12%. This allowed normal subjects to be distinguished from patients with low or moderately elevated LH levels in whom gonadotropin levels in single samples were often in the "normal range."Several aspects of the physiologic control of pulsatile LH secretion were studied. The concordance of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) with LH pulses progressively increased as LH pulse height increased (P < 0.01) suggesting possible hypothalamic mediation of gonadotropin pulses. Measurement of the "apparent half-life" of LH after secretory spikes revealed half times of 34-233 min. It is likely that this variability was attributable to at least two phenomena: (a) constant low level LH secretion that continued after certain secretory episodes but not others; (b) variable mixing of newly secreted LH into at least two pools. The alpha adrenergic-blocking agents, chlorpromazine and phentolamine, failed to block LH secretory spikes at doses sufficient to result in a 30 mm drop in systolic blood pressure in normal men.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci107454

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Santen, R. J., & Bardin, C. W.
Affiliations
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
ORCID
Santen, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Publisher
American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published
1973-10-01
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
2617-2628
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1172/jci107454
PMC
PMC302522
OpenAlex
W2074607818
Cited by
706
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Santen
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
luteinizing hormone, pulsatile LH secretion, gonadotropin secretion, menstrual cycle, follicular phase, luteal phase, anorexia nervosa, hirsutism, amenorrhea, follicle-stimulating hormone, hypothalamic regulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Amenorrhea, Anorexia Nervosa, Chlorpromazine, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Half-Life, Hirsutism, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypogonadism, Hypothalamus, Luteinizing Hormone, Male, Menstruation, Phentolamine, Pituitary Gland, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review