Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generation of Hydroxyl Radical by Enzymes, Chemicals, and Human Phagocytes In Vitro

Open access
Repine, John E., Eaton, John W., Anders, M. W., Hoidal, John R., Fox, Richard B.·1979·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Methane (CH(4)) production from the anti-inflammatory agent, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), was used to measure .OH from chemical reactions or human phagocytes. Reactions producing .OH (xanthine/xanthine oxidase or Fe(++)/EDTA/H(2)O(2)) generated CH(4) from DMSO, whereas reactions yielding primarily O-(2) or H(2)O(2) failed to produce CH(4). Neutrophils (PMN), monocytes, and alveolar macrophages also produced CH(4) from DMSO. Mass spectroscopy using d(6)-DMSO showed formation of d(3)-CH(4) indicating that CH(4) was derived from DMSO. Methane generation by normal but not chronic granulomatous disease or heat-killed phagocytes increased after stimulation with opsonized zymosan particles or the chemical, phorbol myristate acetate. Methane production from DMSO increased as the number of stimulated PMN was increased and the kinetics of CH(4) production approximated other metabolic activities of stimulated PMN. Methane production from stimulated phagocytes and DMSO was markedly decreased by purportedly potent .OH scavengers (thiourea or tryptophane) and diminished to lesser degrees by weaker .OH scavengers (mannitol, ethanol, or sodium benzoate). Superoxide dismutase or catalase also decreased CH(4) production but urea, albumin, inactivated superoxide dismutase, or boiled catalase had no appreciable effect. The results suggest that the production of CH(4) from DMSO may reflect release of .OH from both chemical systems and phagocytic cells. Interaction of the nontoxic, highly permeable DMSO with .OH may explain the anti-inflammatory actions of DMSO and provide a useful measurement of .OH in vitro and in vivo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci109626

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Repine, J. E., Eaton, J. W., Anders, M. W., Hoidal, J. R., & Fox, R. B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1979-12-01
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
1642-1651
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171679874
Cited by
280
References
1
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generation of Hydroxyl Radical by Enzymes, Chemicals, and Human Phagocytes In Vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci109626
The paper
Repine, J. E., Eaton, J. W., Anders, M. W., Hoidal, J. R., & Fox, R. B. (1979). Generation of Hydroxyl Radical by Enzymes, Chemicals, and Human Phagocytes In Vitro. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci109626

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.