Cited by 487Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesChemokine receptors and signalingCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Decreased atherosclerosis in CX3CR1–/– mice reveals a role for fractalkine in atherogenesis

Open access
Lesnik, Philippe, Haskell, Christopher A., Charo, Israel F.·2003·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

The hallmark of early atherosclerosis is the accumulation of lipid-laden macrophages in the subendothelial space. Circulating monocytes are the precursors of these "foam cells," and recent evidence suggests that chemokines play important roles in directing monocyte migration from the blood to the vessel wall. Fractalkine (FK) is a structurally unusual chemokine that can act either as a soluble chemotactic factor or as a transmembrane-anchored adhesion receptor for circulating leukocytes. A polymorphism in the FK receptor, CX(3)CR1, has been linked to a decrease in the incidence of coronary artery disease. To determine whether FK is critically involved in atherogenesis, we deleted the gene for CX(3)CR1 and crossed these mice into the apoE(-/-) background. Here we report that FK is robustly expressed in lesional smooth muscle cells, but not macrophages, in apoE(-/-) mice on a high-fat diet. CX(3)CR1(-/-) mice have a significant reduction in macrophage recruitment to the vessel wall and decreased atherosclerotic lesion formation. Taken together, these data provide strong evidence that FK plays a key role in atherogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci15555

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Harrison, J.K., et al. 1998. Role for neuronally derived fractalkine in mediat- ing interactions between neurons and CX3CR1-expressing microglia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:10896-10901.
  2. Haskell, C.A., et al. 2001. Targeted deletion of CX3CR1 reveals a role for fractalkine in cardiac allograft rejection. J. Clin. Invest. 108:679-688. doi:10.1172/JCI200112976. · DOI
  3. Fortier, A.H., and Falk, L.A. 2002. Isolation of murine macrophages. In Current protocols in immunology. J.E. Coligan, A.M. Kruisbeek, D.M. Mar- gulies, E.M. Shevach, and W. Strober, editors. John Wiley and Sons. New York, New York, USA. [Book online.] 14. Unit 14.1. Basic protocol 2. http://www.mrw2.interscience.wiley.com/cponline/tserver.dll?command =doGetDoc&sUI=&database=CP&useScheme=WIS_Framed.Scheme&get Doc=cp_cpim_fs.html.
  4. Kruisbeek, A.M. 2002. Isolation of mononuclear cell populations. In Cur- rent protocols in immunology. J.E. Coligan, A.M. Kruisbeek, D.M. Margulies, E.M. Shevach, and W. Strober, editors. John Wiley and Sons. New York, New York, USA. [Book online.] 3. Section 1. Unit 3.1. http:// www.mrw2.interscience.wiley.com/cponline/tserver.dll?command=doGet- Doc&sUI=&database=CP&useScheme=WIS_Framed.Scheme&get- Doc=cp_cpim_fs.html

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lesnik, P., Haskell, C. A., & Charo, I. F.
Affiliations
Gladstone Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
Charo, Israel F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
333-340
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156098329
Cited by
487
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 30
FWCI
12.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HL-52773)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL063894, R01HL052773, HL 52773, HL63894)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
fractalkine, CX3CR1, atherosclerosis, atherogenesis, monocyte recruitment, foam cells, macrophage recruitment, chemokines, smooth muscle cells, ApoE-deficient mice, high-fat diet, coronary artery disease
MeSH terms
CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1, Animals, Animal Feed, Aorta, Arteriosclerosis, Cell Movement, Coronary Artery Disease, Dietary Fats, Foam Cells, Genotype, Membrane Proteins, Monocytes, Polymorphism, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Receptors, Chemokine, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Chemokines, CX3C, CD11b Antigen, Mice, Chemokine CX3CL1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review