Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissection of experimental asthma with DNA microarray analysis identifies arginase in asthma pathogenesis

Open access
Zimmermann, Nives, King, Nina E., Laporte, Johanne, Yang, Ming, Mishra, Anil, Pope, Sam M., Muntel, Emily E., Witte, David P., Pegg, Anthony A., Foster, Paul S., Hamid, Qutayba, Rothenberg, Marc E.·2003·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Asthma is on the rise despite intense, ongoing research underscoring the need for new scientific inquiry. In an effort to provide unbiased insight into disease pathogenesis, we took an approach involving expression profiling of lung tissue from mice with experimental asthma. Employing asthma models induced by different allergens and protocols, we identified 6.5% of the tested genome whose expression was altered in an asthmatic lung. Notably, two phenotypically similar models of experimental asthma were shown to have distinct transcript profiles. Genes related to metabolism of basic amino acids, specifically the cationic amino acid transporter 2, arginase I, and arginase II, were particularly prominent among the asthma signature genes. In situ hybridization demonstrated marked staining of arginase I, predominantly in submucosal inflammatory lesions. Arginase activity was increased in allergen-challenged lungs, as demonstrated by increased enzyme activity, and increased levels of putrescine, a downstream product. Lung arginase activity and mRNA expression were strongly induced by IL-4 and IL-13, and were differentially dependent on signal transducer and activator of transcription 6. Analysis of patients with asthma supported the importance of this pathway in human disease. Based on the ability of arginase to regulate generation of NO, polyamines, and collagen, these results provide a basis for pharmacologically targeting arginine metabolism in allergic disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci17912

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 488

Metadata

Authors
Zimmermann, N., King, N. E., Laporte, J., Yang, M., Mishra, A., Pope, S. M., Muntel, E. E., Witte, D. P., Pegg, A. A., Foster, P. S., Hamid, Q., & Rothenberg, M. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2003-06-15
Volume
111
Issue
12
Pages
1863-1874
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129431737
Cited by
488
References
50
FWCI
25.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissection of experimental asthma with DNA microarray analysis identifies arginase in asthma pathogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci17912
The paper
Zimmermann, N., King, N. E., Laporte, J., Yang, M., Mishra, A., Pope, S. M., Muntel, E. E., Witte, D. P., Pegg, A. A., Foster, P. S., Hamid, Q., & Rothenberg, M. E. (2003). Dissection of experimental asthma with DNA microarray analysis identifies arginase in asthma pathogenesis. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci17912

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.