Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 608

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia requires BCL2 to sequester prodeath BIM, explaining sensitivity to BCL2 antagonist ABT-737

Open access
Del Gaizo Moore, Victoria, Brown, Jennifer R., Certo, Michael, Love, Tara M., Novina, Carl D., Letai, Anthony·2007·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Antiapoptotic B cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 (BCL2) family proteins are expressed in many cancers, but the circumstances under which these proteins are necessary for tumor maintenance are poorly understood. We exploited a novel functional assay that uses BCL2 homology domain 3 (BH3) peptides to predict dependence on antiapoptotic proteins, a strategy we call BH3 profiling. BH3 profiling accurately predicts sensitivity to BCL2 antagonist ABT-737 in primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. BH3 profiling also accurately distinguishes myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (MCL1) from BCL2 dependence in myeloma cell lines. We show that the special sensitivity of CLL cells to BCL2 antagonism arises from the requirement that BCL2 tonically sequester proapoptotic BIM in CLL. ABT-737 displaced BIM from BCL2's BH3-binding pocket, allowing BIM to activate BAX, induce mitochondrial permeabilization, and rapidly commit the CLL cell to death. Our experiments demonstrate that BCL2 expression alone does not dictate sensitivity to ABT-737. Instead, BCL2 complexed to BIM is the critical target for ABT-737 in CLL. An important implication is that in cancer, BCL2 may not effectively buffer chemotherapy death signals if it is already sequestering proapoptotic BH3-only proteins. Indeed, activator BH3-only occupation of BCL2 may prime cancer cells for death, offering a potential explanation for the marked chemosensitivity of certain cancers that express abundant BCL2, such as CLL and follicular lymphoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci28281

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Puthalakath, 2002, Cell Death Differ., 9, 505, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400998 · DOI
  2. Kelekar, 1998, Trends Cell Biol., 8, 324, 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01321-X · DOI
  3. Boyd, 1995, Oncogene., 11, 1921
  4. Zong, 2001, Genes Dev., 15, 1481, 10.1101/gad.897601 · DOI
  5. Wei, 2001, Science., 292, 727, 10.1126/science.1059108 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Green, 2004, Science., 305, 626, 10.1126/science.1099320 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wang, 2001, Genes Dev., 15, 2922
  8. Cheng, 1996, Nature., 379, 554, 10.1038/379554a0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cheng, 2001, Mol. Cell., 8, 705, 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00320-3 · DOI
  10. Certo, 2006, Cancer Cell., 9, 351, 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.027 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Oltersdorf, 2005, Nature., 435, 677, 10.1038/nature03579 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bouillet, 1999, Science., 286, 1735, 10.1126/science.286.5445.1735 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Opferman, 2003, Nature., 426, 671, 10.1038/nature02067 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Han, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 22020, 10.1074/jbc.M313234200 · DOI
  15. Han, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 10153, 10.1074/jbc.M510349200 · DOI
  16. Kitada, 1998, Blood., 91, 3379, 10.1182/blood.V91.9.3379 · DOI
  17. Saxena, 2004, Am. J. Hematol., 75, 22, 10.1002/ajh.10453 · DOI
  18. Gomez-Bougie, 2005, Oncogene., 24, 8076, 10.1038/sj.onc.1208949 · DOI
  19. Wei, 2000, Genes Dev., 14, 2060, 10.1101/gad.14.16.2060 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Alves, 2006, Immunity., 24, 703, 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.03.018 · DOI
  21. Zhu, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 7681, 10.1073/pnas.0402293101 · DOI
  22. Marani, 2002, Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 3577, 10.1128/MCB.22.11.3577-3589.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Yamaguchi, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 41604, 10.1074/jbc.M207516200 · DOI
  24. Chen, 2005, Mol. Cell., 17, 393, 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.030 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Derenne, 2002, Blood., 100, 194, 10.1182/blood.V100.1.194 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Green, 2002, Cancer Cell., 1, 19, 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00024-7 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hahn, 2002, Nat. Rev. Cancer., 2, 331, 10.1038/nrc795 · DOI
  28. Calin, 2005, N. Engl. J. Med., 353, 1793, 10.1056/NEJMoa050995 · DOI
  29. O’Brien, 2005, J. Clin. Oncol., 23, 7697, 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.4364 · DOI
  30. Puthalakath, 1999, Mol. Cell., 3, 287, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80456-6 · DOI
  31. Letai, 2004, Cancer Cell., 6, 241, 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.07.011 · DOI
  32. Vaux, 1988, Nature., 335, 440, 10.1038/335440a0 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Dohner, 2000, N. Engl. J. Med., 343, 1910, 10.1056/NEJM200012283432602 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rassenti, 2004, N. Engl. J. Med., 351, 893, 10.1056/NEJMoa040857 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ernst, 2004, Curr. Biol., 14, 2063, 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.012 · DOI

Cited by

See all 608

Metadata

Authors
Del Gaizo Moore, V., Brown, J. R., Certo, M., Love, T. M., Novina, C. D., & Letai, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2007-01-02
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
112-121
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097290512
Cited by
608
References
5
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia requires BCL2 to sequester prodeath BIM, explaining sensitivity to BCL2 antagonist ABT-737. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci28281
The paper
Del Gaizo Moore, V., Brown, J. R., Certo, M., Love, T. M., Novina, C. D., & Letai, A. (2007). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia requires BCL2 to sequester prodeath BIM, explaining sensitivity to BCL2 antagonist ABT-737. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci28281

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.