Cited by 562interferon and immune responsesSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchImmune Response and Inflammation

Inherited STING-activating mutation underlies a familial inflammatory syndrome with lupus-like manifestations

Open access
Jeremiah, Nadia, Neven, Bénédicte, Gentili, Matteo, Callebaut, Isabelle, Maschalidi, Sophia, Stolzenberg, Marie-Claude, Goudin, Nicolas, Frémond, Marie-Louis +10 more·2014·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Innate immunity to viral infection involves induction of the type I IFN response; however, dysfunctional regulation of this pathway leads to inappropriate inflammation. Here, we evaluated a nonconsanguineous family of mixed European descent, with 4 members affected by systemic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, including lupus, with variable clinical expression. We identified a germline dominant gain-of-function mutation in TMEM173, which encodes stimulator of type I IFN gene (STING), in the affected individuals. STING is a key signaling molecule in cytosolic DNA-sensing pathways, and STING activation normally requires dimerization, which is induced by 2'3' cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) produced by the cGAMP synthase in response to cytosolic DNA. Structural modeling supported constitutive activation of the mutant STING protein based on stabilized dimerization. In agreement with the model predictions, we found that the STING mutant spontaneously localizes in the Golgi of patient fibroblasts and is constitutively active in the absence of exogenous 2'3'-cGAMP in vitro. Accordingly, we observed elevated serum IFN activity and a type I IFN signature in peripheral blood from affected family members. These findings highlight the key role of STING in activating both the innate and adaptive immune responses and implicate aberrant STING activation in features of human lupus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci79100

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rare STING gain-of-function mutations are associated with massive inflammation especially in lungs.

    “Conversely, rare STING gain-of-function mutations are associated with massive inflammation especially in lungs (88).”

    From Connecting aging biology and inflammation in the omics era (2022) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeremiah, N., Neven, B., Gentili, M., Callebaut, I., Maschalidi, S., Stolzenberg, M.-C., Goudin, N., Frémond, M.-L., Nitschke, P., Molina, T. J., Blanche, S., Picard, C., Rice, G. I., Crow, Y. J., Manel, N., Fischer, A., Bader-Meunier, B., & Rieux-Laucat, F.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Neven, Bénédicte
  • Gentili, Matteo
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2014-11-17
Volume
124
Issue
12
Pages
5516-5520
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966408457
Cited by
562
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 1
FWCI
16.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
  • Fondation Arthritis
  • Fondation Acteria
  • Institut des maladies génétiques Imagine (ANR-10-IAHU- 01)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE14-0026, CE14-0026-01, ANR-10-IAHU- 01, 249816, ANR-10-IAHU-0001, 10-IAHU-01, ANR-10)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (ANR‐10‐IAHU‐01, 249816)
  • Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (309848)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
STING, gain-of-function mutations, type I interferonopathy, type I interferon response, cGAMP, cytosolic DNA sensing, Golgi localization, autoimmunity, innate immunity
MeSH terms
STING Protein, Adult, Aged, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Interferon Type I, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Male, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Nucleotides, Cyclic, Syndrome, Signal Transduction, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Protein Multimerization, Adaptive Immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review