Cited by 251interferon and immune responsesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Cytosolic DNA Sensing in Organismal Tumor Control

Open access
Vanpouille-Box, Claire, Demaria, Sandra, Formenti, Silvia C., Galluzzi, Lorenzo·2018·Cancer Cell

Abstract

Besides constituting a first layer of defense against microbial challenges, the detection of cytosolic DNA is fundamental for mammalian organisms to control malignant transformation and tumor progression. The accumulation of DNA in the cytoplasm can initiate the proliferative inactivation (via cellular senescence) or elimination (via regulated cell death) of neoplastic cell precursors. Moreover, cytosolic DNA sensing is intimately connected to the secretion of cytokines that support innate and adaptive antitumor immunity. Here, we discuss the molecular mechanisms whereby cytosolic DNA enables cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic oncosuppression, and their relevance for the development of novel therapeutic approaches that reinstate anticancer immunosurveillance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.013

Cites

187 of 187 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genomic stress and DDR defects promote cytosolic accumulation of single-stranded DNA, which supports oncosuppressive processes including a cancer-cell-dependent immunostimulatory response driven by CGAS and STING.

    “Both genomic stress and DDR defects favor the cytosolic accumulation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in support of various oncosuppressive processes, including a cancer-celldependent immunostimulatory response driven by cyclic GMPAMP synthase (CGAS) and stimulator of interferon response cGAMP interactor 1 (STING1; best known as STING) (Vanpouille-Box et al., 2018)”

    From Immunomodulation by targeted anticancer agents (2021) · cites this paper as Vanpouille-Box et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanpouille-Box, C., Demaria, S., Formenti, S. C., & Galluzzi, L.
Affiliations
Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Galluzzi, Lorenzo
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
361-378
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811281203
Cited by
250
References
187
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation
  • NIH (R01 CA201246, R01 CA198533)
  • The Chemotherapy Foundation
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Phosplatin Therapeutics
  • Sotio a.s.
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
cytosolic DNA sensing, tumor control, cellular senescence, regulated cell death, antitumor immunity, cytokine production, oncosuppression, tumor surveillance, innate immunity, malignant transformation, tumor progression
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Cytosol, DNA, Humans, Immunologic Surveillance, Neoplasms, Cellular Senescence, Apoptosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review