The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Remotely Sensed Global Terrestrial Drought Severity Index
Open accessAbstract
Regional drought and flooding from extreme climatic events are increasing in frequency and severity, with significant adverse ecosocial impacts. Detecting and monitoring drought at regional to global scales remains challenging, despite the availability of various drought indices and widespread availability of potentially synergistic global satellite observational records. The authors have developed a method to generate a near-real-time remotely sensed drought severity index (DSI) to monitor and detect drought globally at 1-km spatial resolution and regular 8-day, monthly, and annual frequencies. The new DSI integrates and exploits information from current operational satellite-based terrestrial evapo-transpiration (ET) and vegetation greenness index [normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)] products, which are sensitive to vegetation water stress. Specifically, this approach determines the annual DSI departure from its normal (2000–11) using the remotely sensed ratio of ET to potential ET (PET) and NDVI. The DSI results were derived globally and captured documented major regional droughts over the last decade, including severe events in Europe (2003), the Amazon (2005 and 2010), and Russia (2010). The DSI corresponded favorably (correlation coefficient r = 0.43) with the precipitation-based Palmer drought severity index (PDSI), while both indices captured similar wetting and drying patterns. The DSI was also correlated with satellite-based vegetation net primary production (NPP) records, indicating that the combined use of these products may be useful for assessing water supply and ecosystem interactions, including drought impacts on crop yields and forest productivity. The remotely sensed global terrestrial DSI enhances capabilities for nearreal-time drought monitoring to assist decision makers in regional drought assessment and mitigation efforts, and without many of the constraints of more traditional drought monitoring methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity
Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S. E., Sullivan, C. A., Liermann, C. R., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09440 · Cited by 7,582
Global hydrological cycles and world water resources
Oki, T., & Kanae, S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128845 · Cited by 4,392
Drought under global warming: a review
Dai, A. (2011) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.81 · Cited by 3,523
The Hot Summer of 2010: Redrawing the Temperature Record Map of Europe
Barriopedro, D., Fischer, E. M., Luterbacher, J., Trigo, R. M., & García-Herrera, R. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201224 · Cited by 1,656
Lewis, S. L., Brando, P. M., Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G. M. F., & Nepstad, D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200807 · Cited by 1,111
The drought of Amazonia in 2005.
Marengo, J. A., Nobre, C. A., Tomasella, J., Oyama, M. D., Sampaio de Oliveira, G., de Oliveira, R., Camargo, H., Alves, L. M., & Brown, I. F. (2008) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli1600.1 · Cited by 725
Cited by
Remote sensing of drought: Progress, challenges and opportunities
AghaKouchak, A., Farahmand, A., Melton, F. S., Teixeira, J., Anderson, M. C., Wardlow, B. D., & Hain, C. R. (2015) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2014rg000456 · Cited by 989
A generalized framework for deriving nonparametric standardized drought indicators
Farahmand, A., & AghaKouchak, A. (2015) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.11.012 · Cited by 512
A Drought Monitoring and Forecasting System for Sub-Sahara African Water Resources and Food Security
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Chaney, N., Guan, K., Sadri, S., Yuan, X., Olang, L., Amani, A., Ali, A., Demuth, S., et al. (2014) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-12-00124.1 · Cited by 440
Evaluating theories of drought‐induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel–experiment framework
McDowell, N. G., Fisher, R. A., Xu, C., Domec, J. C., Hölttä, T., Mackay, D. S., Sperry, J. S., Boutz, A., Dickman, L., Gehres, N., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12465 · Cited by 420
Self-citationHobbins, M. T., Wood, A., McEvoy, D. J., Huntington, J. L., Morton, C., Anderson, M., & Hain, C. (2016) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-15-0121.1 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Mu, Q., Zhao, M., Kimball, J. S., McDowell, N. G., & Running, S. W.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-98
- ISSN
- 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0477
- OpenAlex
- W2031441528
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 18.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Remotely Sensed Global Terrestrial Drought Severity Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/bams-d-11-00213.1
- The paper
- Mu, Q., Zhao, M., Kimball, J. S., McDowell, N. G., & Running, S. W. (2013). A Remotely Sensed Global Terrestrial Drought Severity Index. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-11-00213.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.