Cited by 106Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Two Modes of Change of the Distribution of Rain*

Pendergrass, Angeline G., Hartmann, Dennis L.·2014·Journal of Climate

Abstract

The frequency and intensity of rainfall determine its character and may change with climate. A methodology for characterizing the frequency and amount of rainfall as functions of the rain rate is developed. Two modes of response are defined, one in which the distribution of rainfall increases in equal fraction at all rain rates and one in which the rainfall shifts to higher or lower rain rates without a change in mean rainfall. This description of change is applied to the tropical distribution of daily rainfall over ENSO phases in models and observations. The description fits observations and most models well, although some models also have an extreme mode in which the frequency increases at extremely high rain rates. The multimodel mean from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) agrees with observations in showing a very large shift of 14%–15% K−1, indicating large increases in the heaviest rain rates associated with El Niño. Models with an extreme mode response to global warming do not agree as well with observations of the rainfall response to El Niño.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jcli-d-14-00182.1

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some models show disproportionate increases in precipitation extremes compared to other parts of the precipitation distribution, an extreme mode in the tropical response to climate change that relates to gridpoint storms.

    “the disproportionate increases in precipitation extremes compared to other parts of the precipitation distribution that is found in some models—an “extreme mode” in the tropical response to climate change that relates to gridpoint storms [66, 67].”

    From Precipitation Extremes Under Climate Change (2015) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pendergrass, A. G., & Hartmann, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Pendergrass, Angeline G.
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2014-11-04
Volume
27
Issue
22
Pages
8357-8371
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2135049796
Cited by
106
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
rainfall distribution, rainfall intensity, rainfall frequency, ENSO, El Niño, climate change response, extreme rainfall, CMIP5, global warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review