Cited by 329Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Changes in the Distribution of Rain Frequency and Intensity in Response to Global Warming*

Open access
Pendergrass, Angeline G., Hartmann, Dennis L.·2014·Journal of Climate

Abstract

Changes in the frequency and intensity of rainfall are an important potential impact of climate change. Two modes of change, a shift and an increase, are applied to simulations of global warming with models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The response to CO2 doubling in the multimodel mean of CMIP5 daily rainfall is characterized by an increase of 1% K−1 at all rain rates and a shift to higher rain rates of 3.3% K−1. In addition to these increase and shift modes of change, some models also show a substantial increase in rainfall at the highest rain rates called the extreme mode of response to warming. In some models, this extreme mode can be shown to be associated with increases in grid-scale condensation or gridpoint storms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jcli-d-14-00183.1

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some models show disproportionate increases in precipitation extremes compared to other parts of the precipitation distribution, an extreme mode in the tropical response to climate change that relates to gridpoint storms.

    “the disproportionate increases in precipitation extremes compared to other parts of the precipitation distribution that is found in some models—an “extreme mode” in the tropical response to climate change that relates to gridpoint storms [66, 67].”

    From Precipitation Extremes Under Climate Change (2015) · cites this paper as [66]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pendergrass, A. G., & Hartmann, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Pendergrass, Angeline G.
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2014-11-04
Volume
27
Issue
22
Pages
8372-8383
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2108644185
Cited by
329
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0960497)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
rainfall frequency, rainfall intensity, global warming, climate change impacts, CMIP5, CO2 doubling, heavy rainfall, daily precipitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review